H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Regina Marsikova vs Laura Arraya H2H: 1-0
Regina Marsikova holds a 1–0 lead over Laura Arraya in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Regina Marsikova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Regina Marsikova won the 1985 Barcelona third round 7-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 67
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
PER
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 1985* | Barcelona | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Regina Marsikova | 7-6 6-2 | Laura Arraya | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regina Marsikova | — | — | — | 2,044 | 266 | 198 | 57.3% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 15 |
| Laura Arraya | #192 | #14 | 51 | 1,922 | 270 | 204 | 57.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Regina Marsikova | Laura Arraya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1974 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1975 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1976 | 17–15 | 53.1% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 19–8 | 70.4% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | 1977 | 37–17 | 68.5% | — | 1,906 | 0 | 8 | 1982 | 33–17 | 66.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 7 |
| 19 | 1978 | 56–30 | 65.1% | — | 1,952 | 0 | 12 | 1983 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 7 |
| 20 | 1979 | 38–24 | 61.3% | — | 1,924 | 0 | 12 | 1984 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #34 | 1,760 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1980 | 33–22 | 60.0% | — | 1,937 | 0 | 14 | 1985 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #63 | 1,693 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 1981 | 34–16 | 68.0% | — | 2,005 | 0 | 15 | 1986 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,718 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,770 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1985 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,767 | 0 | 15 | 1990 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #21 | 1,821 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 1986 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 15 | 1991 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,823 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 1987 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,674 | 0 | 15 | 1992 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #45 | 1,734 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 1988 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 15 | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #71 | 1,683 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 1989 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |