H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Regina Marsikova vs Laura Garrone H2H: 1-1
Regina Marsikova and Laura Garrone are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Laura Garrone leads 1–0 on clay, while Regina Marsikova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Regina Marsikova won the 1986 Mahwah third round 7-6 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 67
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 58
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 1986* | Mahwah | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Regina Marsikova | 7-6 3-6 6-3 | Laura Garrone | Match data |
| Apr 24, 1986* | Charleston | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Laura Garrone | 7-5 1-6 7-5 | Regina Marsikova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regina Marsikova | — | — | — | 2,044 | 266 | 198 | 57.3% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 15 |
| Laura Garrone | #262 | #32 | 90 | 1,726 | 109 | 130 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Regina Marsikova | Laura Garrone | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1974 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1975 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1976 | 17–15 | 53.1% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #203 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1977 | 37–17 | 68.5% | — | 1,906 | 0 | 8 | 1986 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #38 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1978 | 56–30 | 65.1% | — | 1,952 | 0 | 12 | 1987 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #86 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1979 | 38–24 | 61.3% | — | 1,924 | 0 | 12 | 1988 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1980 | 33–22 | 60.0% | — | 1,937 | 0 | 14 | 1989 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1981 | 34–16 | 68.0% | — | 2,005 | 0 | 15 | 1990 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #65 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #93 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #156 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1985 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,767 | 0 | 15 | 1994 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #167 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1986 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 15 | 1995 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #194 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1987 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,674 | 0 | 15 | 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #258 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1988 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 15 | 1997 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #224 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1989 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |