H2H data updated: 2026-11-05 00:00 UTC

Regina Marsikova vs Laura Golarsa H2H: 0-1

Laura Golarsa holds a 1–0 lead over Regina Marsikova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Laura Golarsa leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Laura Golarsa won the 1988 Athens round of 16 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Regina Marsikova
CZE Age 67
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Laura Golarsa
ITA Age 58 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Laura Golarsa #98 6-2 6-1 Regina Marsikova Match data Aug 5, 1988* R16 Athens WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Regina Marsikova — — — 2,036 266 198 57.3% 0 0 0 2 13 15
Laura Golarsa — #39 436 1,761 127 180 41.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Regina Marsikova Laura Golarsa
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1974 0–2 0.0% — 1,499 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1975 5–5 50.0% — 1,581 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1976 17–15 53.1% — 1,748 0 1 1985 5–1 83.3% #166 1,563 0 1
18 1977 37–17 68.5% — 1,907 0 8 1986 5–5 50.0% #167 1,593 0 1
19 1978 56–30 65.1% — 1,953 0 12 1987 6–10 37.5% #121 1,574 0 1
20 1979 38–24 61.3% — 1,938 0 12 1988 11–14 44.0% #79 1,618 0 1
21 1980 33–22 60.0% — 1,902 0 14 1989 22–18 55.0% #58 1,707 0 1
22 1981 34–16 68.0% — 1,998 0 15 1990 14–16 46.7% #61 1,689 0 1
23 — — — — — — — 1991 3–13 18.8% #213 1,546 0 1
24 — — — — — — — 1992 5–10 33.3% #125 1,522 0 1
25 — — — — — — — 1993 17–18 48.6% #69 1,637 0 1
26 1985 12–16 42.9% — 1,764 0 15 1994 13–22 37.1% #112 1,582 0 1
27 1986 15–19 44.1% — 1,720 0 15 1995 5–10 33.3% #149 1,551 0 1
28 1987 14–19 42.4% — 1,672 0 15 1996 1–8 11.1% #145 1,468 0 1
29 1988 4–7 36.4% — 1,605 0 15 1997 7–9 43.8% #62 1,532 0 1
30 1989 1–6 14.3% — 1,541 0 15 1998 10–16 38.5% #94 1,570 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 1999 3–10 23.1% #168 1,512 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Regina Marsikova Laura Golarsa
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1974 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1976 — — — — 15 7 22 68.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 6 7 14.3% 1985 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 25 5 30 83.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1986 — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1978 17 10 27 63.0% 21 4 25 84.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 5 11 16 31.3% 1987 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
20 1979 12 7 19 63.2% 17 7 24 70.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1988 3 4 7 42.9% 6 7 13 46.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1980 15 7 22 68.2% 10 4 14 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 9 17 47.1% 1989 6 5 11 54.5% 6 7 13 46.2% 6 3 9 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1%
22 1981 8 4 12 66.7% 25 9 34 73.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1990 1 5 6 16.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 — — — — 2 7 9 22.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 8 8 16 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
26 1985 4 6 10 40.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 4 10 14 28.6% 2 7 9 22.2% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
27 1986 7 8 15 46.7% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1995 0 5 5 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
28 1987 2 3 5 40.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 1996 1 2 3 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — — 1997 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 1998 5 6 11 45.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 3 3 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
Career — 65 49 114 57.0% 144 74 218 66.1% 32 28 60 53.3% 24 46 70 34.3% — 32 57 89 36.0% 38 66 104 36.5% 36 32 68 52.9% 16 25 41 39.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Regina Marsikova Laura Golarsa
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1974 1500 116.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1975 1582 125.6 — — — — +75 +3 — 50.0% +0.04 3–3 (50%) 2–0 — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1976 1748 142.5 — — — — -178 +62 -175 51.3% +0.34 7–7 (50%) 1–8 (11%) 97.4 -1.71 1985 1564 114.0 — — — — — — — 78.6% +1.93 1–1 2–0 — +0.48
18 1977 1908 143.3 — — — — -346 +115 -246 62.5% +0.85 14–6 (70%) 5–4 (56%) 108.7 +0.40 1986 1593 115.4 — — — — — -11 — 47.6% -0.29 1–0 — — +0.23
19 1978 1953 158.0 — — — — -97 +117 -135 64.0% +0.95 12–9 (57%) 8–6 (57%) 108.6 -6.67 1987 1575 116.5 — — — — 0 -50 — 44.4% -0.45 2–4 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +1.00
20 1979 1938 147.7 — — — — -80 +153 -92 60.4% +0.53 11–8 (58%) 12–8 (60%) 103.7 -2.57 1988 1619 117.2 — — — — -51 -32 -19 41.1% -0.75 5–1 (83%) 1–4 (20%) 103.9 -0.40
21 1980 1902 147.9 — — — — -21 +194 — 56.1% +0.38 8–6 (57%) 6–4 (60%) 100.5 -6.24 1989 1707 132.9 — — — — -45 -98 -5 54.0% +0.19 10–10 (50%) 4–6 (40%) 101.3 +1.15
22 1981 1999 159.4 — — — — -116 +183 — 63.3% +0.90 10–3 (77%) 2–2 (50%) 103.0 -5.46 1990 1690 132.6 — — — — -82 -4 +52 46.8% -0.02 1–3 (25%) 2–6 (25%) 94.9 -1.45
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1547 105.2 — — — — +1 +37 +163 27.8% -1.47 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.04
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1523 112.5 — — — — +36 +92 +101 37.1% -1.20 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +0.67
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1638 128.6 — — — — -13 -51 +65 46.1% -0.12 5–3 (63%) 2–6 (25%) 100.6 +1.03
26 1985 1765 131.6 — — — — +5 +293 -79 49.2% -0.07 0–5 (0%) 6–2 (75%) 94.5 -2.24 1994 1582 122.4 — — — — -42 -57 +220 44.4% -0.69 3–10 (23%) 6–1 (86%) 97.8 +0.97
27 1986 1720 127.0 — — — — +3 +191 — 41.8% -0.58 8–3 (73%) 3–2 (60%) 103.4 -2.14 1995 1552 111.8 — — — — -75 -12 +209 39.4% -0.45 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 94.1 +0.07
28 1987 1673 129.0 — — — — +35 +91 -19 46.1% -0.37 5–7 (42%) 4–5 (44%) 95.0 -2.64 1996 1468 102.9 — — — — +25 -5 — 15.0% -2.40 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.35
29 1988 1606 99.5 — — — — — +86 — 33.3% -2.00 2–0 1–0 — +0.61 1997 1532 103.8 — — — — -26 -77 +234 46.2% -0.51 3–4 (43%) 2–0 — +0.63
30 1989 1541 97.0 — — — — — +71 — 14.3% -2.21 — 0–1 — +0.26 1998 1570 108.1 — — — — -36 -153 +173 40.0% -0.78 4–4 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 102.2 +0.62
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1513 94.5 — — — — -8 -138 +220 22.2% -2.37 1–0 — — +0.07
Career — 2036 150.6 — — — — -67 +139 -142 55.7% +0.35 80–57 (58%) 50–42 (54%) 107.3 -6.31 — 1762 124.1 — — — — -30 -44 +124 43.2% -0.54 39–51 (43%) 26–34 (43%) 97.6 +1.78

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.