H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Regina Marsikova vs Mareen Louie Harper H2H: 2-1
Regina Marsikova holds a 2–1 lead over Mareen Louie Harper in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Regina Marsikova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mareen Louie Harper won the 1985 Manhattan Beach third round 6-3 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 1985* | Manhattan Beach | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Mareen Louie Harper | 6-3 4-6 6-3 | Regina Marsikova | Match data |
| May 2, 1985* | Houston | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Regina Marsikova | 6-3 6-1 | Mareen Louie Harper | Match data |
| Apr 1, 1979* | Carlsbad | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Regina Marsikova | 2-6 7-5 7-6 | Mareen Louie Harper | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regina Marsikova | — | — | — | 2,044 | 266 | 198 | 57.3% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 15 |
| Mareen Louie Harper | — | — | — | 1,911 | 177 | 239 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Regina Marsikova | Mareen Louie Harper | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1974 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1975 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1976 | 17–15 | 53.1% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1977 | 37–17 | 68.5% | — | 1,906 | 0 | 8 | 1979 | 4–13 | 23.5% | — | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1978 | 56–30 | 65.1% | — | 1,952 | 0 | 12 | 1980 | 22–23 | 48.9% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1979 | 38–24 | 61.3% | — | 1,924 | 0 | 12 | 1981 | 16–20 | 44.4% | — | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1980 | 33–22 | 60.0% | — | 1,937 | 0 | 14 | 1982 | 9–18 | 33.3% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1981 | 34–16 | 68.0% | — | 2,005 | 0 | 15 | 1983 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 18–17 | 51.4% | — | 1,733 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 29–18 | 61.7% | — | 1,777 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,680 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1985 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,767 | 0 | 15 | 1987 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1986 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 15 | 1988 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,614 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1987 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,674 | 0 | 15 | 1989 | 6–14 | 30.0% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1988 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 15 | 1990 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,591 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1989 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 15 | 1991 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,615 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–7 | 12.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 2 |