H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Regina Rajchrtova vs Laura Arraya H2H: 2-1
Regina Rajchrtova holds a 2–1 lead over Laura Arraya in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Regina Rajchrtova leads 2–0 on clay, while Laura Arraya leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Laura Arraya won the 1990 Wimbledon second round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TCH
Age 58
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
PER
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 1990* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Laura Arraya | 6-2 6-2 | Regina Rajchrtova | Match data |
| May 10, 1990* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Regina Rajchrtova | 6-4 7-6(4) | Laura Arraya | Match data |
| Apr 6, 1990* | Hilton Head | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Regina Rajchrtova | 6-4 6-2 | Laura Arraya | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regina Rajchrtova | #340 | #26 | 32 | 1,798 | 63 | 65 | 49.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Laura Arraya | #192 | #14 | 51 | 1,922 | 270 | 204 | 57.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Regina Rajchrtova | Laura Arraya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 19–8 | 70.4% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 33–17 | 66.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 7 |
| 19 | 1987 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #89 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 7 |
| 20 | 1988 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #193 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #34 | 1,760 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1989 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #40 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #63 | 1,693 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 1990 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #55 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,718 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1991 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #39 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,770 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1992 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #212 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #21 | 1,821 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,823 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #45 | 1,734 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #71 | 1,683 | 0 | 10 |