H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Regina Rajchrtova vs Tami Whitlinger Jones H2H: 1-1
Regina Rajchrtova and Tami Whitlinger Jones are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Regina Rajchrtova leads 1–0 on clay, while Tami Whitlinger Jones leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tami Whitlinger Jones won the 1992 Sydney second round 6-1 1-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 1992* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Tami Whitlinger Jones | 6-1 1-0 (ret.) | Regina Rajchrtova | Match data |
| May 30, 1990* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Regina Rajchrtova | 6-2 6-0 | Tami Whitlinger Jones | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regina Rajchrtova | #340 | #26 | 32 | 1,798 | 63 | 65 | 49.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tami Whitlinger Jones | — | — | — | 1,786 | 106 | 135 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Regina Rajchrtova | Tami Whitlinger Jones | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1987 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #89 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1988 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #193 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1989 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #40 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1990 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #55 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1991 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #39 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1992 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #212 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 13–19 | 40.6% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 16–18 | 47.1% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | — | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 10–13 | 43.5% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 2–11 | 15.4% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |