H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Renata Tomanova vs Anne Smith H2H: 0-2
Anne Smith holds a 2–0 lead over Renata Tomanova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anne Smith leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anne Smith won the 1979 Filderstadt third round 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 71
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
Age 67
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 1979* | Filderstadt | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Anne Smith | 6-2 6-0 | Renata Tomanova | Match data |
| Aug 31, 1979* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Anne Smith | 6-2 6-4 | Renata Tomanova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renata Tomanova | — | — | — | 1,940 | 225 | 214 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Anne Smith | — | — | — | 2,050 | 221 | 173 | 56.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Renata Tomanova | Anne Smith | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1970 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1972 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 8–3 | 72.7% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1973 | 20–15 | 57.1% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 14–7 | 66.7% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1974 | 21–14 | 60.0% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 4 | 1979 | 28–28 | 50.0% | — | 1,847 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1975 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 6 | 1980 | 21–21 | 50.0% | — | 1,866 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1976 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 8 | 1981 | 36–25 | 59.0% | — | 1,934 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1977 | 28–26 | 51.9% | — | 1,854 | 0 | 9 | 1982 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1978 | 28–25 | 52.8% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 9 | 1983 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,897 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1979 | 21–26 | 44.7% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 9 | 1984 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,873 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1980 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 9 | 1985 | 10–4 | 71.4% | — | 1,899 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1981 | 18–16 | 52.9% | — | 1,682 | 0 | 9 | 1986 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1982 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,694 | 0 | 9 | 1987 | 15–9 | 62.5% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1983 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 9 | 1988 | 8–8 | 50.0% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 9 | 1989 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,848 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1985 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 9 | 1990 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,827 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 9 | 1991 | 8–5 | 61.5% | — | 1,820 | 0 | 3 |