H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Renata Tomanova vs Anne Smith H2H: 0-2

Anne Smith holds a 2–0 lead over Renata Tomanova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anne Smith leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anne Smith won the 1979 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix round of 32 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Renata Tomanova
GER Age 71 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Anne Smith
USA Age 67 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anne Smith 6-2 6-0 Renata Tomanova Match data Nov 8, 1979* R32 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix WTA 250 Carpet
Anne Smith 6-2 6-4 Renata Tomanova Match data Aug 31, 1979* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Renata Tomanova — — — 1,945 223 212 51.3% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Anne Smith — — — 2,051 221 173 56.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Renata Tomanova Anne Smith
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1970 4–4 50.0% — 1,500 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1971 1–1 50.0% — 1,499 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1972 0–2 0.0% — 1,480 0 0 1977 8–3 72.7% — 1,634 0 1
18 1973 18–14 56.2% — 1,615 0 0 1978 14–7 66.7% — 1,776 0 2
19 1974 21–13 61.8% — 1,719 0 4 1979 28–28 50.0% — 1,849 0 2
20 1975 23–16 59.0% — 1,813 0 6 1980 21–21 50.0% — 1,866 0 2
21 1976 28–22 56.0% — 1,847 0 8 1981 36–25 59.0% — 1,936 0 2
22 1977 28–26 51.9% — 1,858 0 9 1982 27–19 58.7% — 1,899 0 2
23 1978 28–25 52.8% — 1,759 0 9 1983 11–9 55.0% — 1,898 0 2
24 1979 21–26 44.7% — 1,691 0 9 1984 1–2 33.3% — 1,874 0 2
25 1980 22–22 50.0% — 1,678 0 9 1985 10–4 71.4% — 1,900 0 3
26 1981 18–16 52.9% — 1,680 0 9 1986 8–13 38.1% — 1,718 0 3
27 1982 9–12 42.9% — 1,691 0 9 1987 15–9 62.5% — 1,785 0 3
28 1983 1–8 11.1% — 1,596 0 9 1988 8–8 50.0% — 1,777 0 3
29 1984 0–1 0.0% — 1,580 0 9 1989 10–6 62.5% — 1,850 0 3
30 1985 1–2 33.3% — 1,569 0 9 1990 16–14 53.3% — 1,827 0 3
31 1986 0–2 0.0% — 1,532 0 9 1991 8–5 61.5% — 1,821 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Renata Tomanova Anne Smith
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1970 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1971 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1972 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1977 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 0 5 100.0%
18 1973 — — — — 17 9 26 65.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1978 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — 5 4 9 55.6%
19 1974 — — — — 19 8 27 70.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1979 9 6 15 60.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 11 13 24 45.8%
20 1975 2 2 4 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1980 7 5 12 58.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 11 19 42.1%
21 1976 2 1 3 66.7% 17 7 24 70.8% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 6 6 0.0% 1981 7 4 11 63.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 9 5 14 64.3% 16 11 27 59.3%
22 1977 1 5 6 16.7% 17 7 24 70.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 7 10 17 41.2% 1982 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 17 13 30 56.7%
23 1978 4 4 8 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 13 7 20 65.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 1983 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 6 6 12 50.0%
24 1979 1 7 8 12.5% 9 6 15 60.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1980 5 6 11 45.5% 10 7 17 58.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1985 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
26 1981 5 4 9 55.6% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
27 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1987 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7%
28 1983 0 1 1 0.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1988 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1989 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 7 3 10 70.0%
30 1985 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1990 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
31 1986 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1991 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
Career — 21 32 53 39.6% 130 86 216 60.2% 41 43 84 48.8% 20 46 66 30.3% — 67 49 116 57.8% 20 24 44 45.5% 37 27 64 57.8% 88 73 161 54.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Renata Tomanova Anne Smith
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1970 1500 96.0 — — — — +67 -2 — 40.0% -0.50 4–0 (100%) — — +1.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1971 1499 98.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1972 1481 96.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — -0.01 1977 1634 138.6 — — — — +87 — — 70.4% +1.74 2–3 (40%) — — +1.53
18 1973 1615 134.4 — — — — -83 +113 — 52.1% +0.38 7–2 (78%) 1–2 (33%) 106.4 +2.79 1978 1777 139.8 — — — — +30 — — 68.3% +1.39 1–2 (33%) 3–0 (100%) 101.7 +0.88
19 1974 1720 129.8 — — — — -209 +100 — 58.7% +0.75 7–2 (78%) 4–2 (67%) 107.8 +2.40 1979 1849 152.6 — — — — -9 -187 -232 48.5% -0.04 13–9 (59%) 7–6 (54%) 108.4 -3.77
20 1975 1814 140.9 — — — — -168 +118 -259 54.4% +0.01 9–3 (75%) 4–3 (57%) 106.1 -2.52 1980 1866 144.9 — — — — -31 -177 -216 47.8% -0.08 6–4 (60%) 4–5 (44%) 101.9 -5.69
21 1976 1847 140.8 — — — — -234 +75 -172 54.5% +0.33 6–6 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 98.4 -2.73 1981 1936 153.7 — — — — +39 -231 -156 57.9% +0.56 9–9 (50%) 5–9 (36%) 98.6 -4.67
22 1977 1859 152.5 — — — — -167 +104 -182 52.5% +0.14 6–10 (38%) 4–7 (36%) 93.1 -7.11 1982 1899 156.9 — — — — +43 -216 -37 60.2% +0.58 5–8 (38%) 4–3 (57%) 97.2 -0.82
23 1978 1759 129.4 — — — — -92 +115 +15 52.9% +0.13 6–9 (40%) 6–4 (60%) 97.2 +1.55 1983 1898 139.9 — — — — +42 — — 51.1% +0.02 5–2 (71%) 1–2 (33%) 100.5 -2.37
24 1979 1692 132.3 — — — — -101 +238 +54 45.5% -0.34 10–8 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 100.6 +2.45 1984 1875 92.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — 0–1 — -0.29
25 1980 1679 128.6 — — — — -147 +207 +30 51.5% +0.20 4–7 (36%) 1–3 (25%) 95.3 -0.95 1985 1900 131.1 — — — — — -248 -3 64.5% +0.90 3–0 (100%) 2–0 — -1.34
26 1981 1680 123.2 — — — — -37 +172 -12 51.2% +0.18 8–6 (57%) 2–3 (40%) 100.4 +0.40 1986 1719 120.9 — — — — +23 -56 — 40.9% -0.36 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.98
27 1982 1692 123.3 — — — — -86 +88 -12 44.2% -0.42 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -1.63 1987 1786 131.9 — — — — +7 — +60 60.0% +0.69 4–3 (57%) 0–1 — +0.68
28 1983 1597 97.2 — — — — — +86 — 21.1% -2.40 0–2 1–0 — +0.01 1988 1778 135.5 — — — — +14 — — 50.0% +0.21 1–1 0–2 — -0.68
29 1984 1580 98.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.09 1989 1851 140.5 — — — — -6 — — 58.3% +0.50 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 105.0 -0.03
30 1985 1569 101.2 — — — — — +46 — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — +0.04 1990 1828 147.1 — — — — -8 — +19 53.7% +0.49 3–4 (43%) 5–3 (63%) 98.2 -1.19
31 1986 1532 90.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.34 1991 1822 132.5 — — — — 0 — — 60.7% +0.46 1–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.30
Career — 1946 138.0 — — — — -126 +121 -54 50.6% +0.03 69–57 (55%) 30–33 (48%) 100.5 -0.54 — 2051 154.3 — — — — +14 -189 -73 54.9% +0.38 58–49 (54%) 38–35 (52%) 106.1 -4.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.