H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Renata Tomanova vs Barbara Hallquist H2H: 0-1

Barbara Hallquist holds a 1–0 lead over Renata Tomanova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Barbara Hallquist leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbara Hallquist won the 1979 Carlsbad round of 16 2-6 6-3 6-2.

GER Age 71 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Barbara Hallquist 2-6 6-3 6-2 Renata Tomanova Match data Apr 1, 1979* R16 Carlsbad WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Renata Tomanova — — — 1,948 225 213 51.4% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Barbara Hallquist — — — 1,778 67 90 42.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Renata Tomanova Barbara Hallquist
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1970 4–4 50.0% — 1,500 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1971 1–1 50.0% — 1,499 0 0 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,516 0 0
17 1972 0–2 0.0% — 1,480 0 0 1974 2–3 40.0% — 1,500 0 0
18 1973 18–14 56.2% — 1,615 0 0 1975 3–1 75.0% — 1,541 0 0
19 1974 21–13 61.8% — 1,719 0 4 1976 0–1 0.0% — 1,530 0 0
20 1975 23–16 59.0% — 1,813 0 6 1977 4–2 66.7% — 1,577 0 0
21 1976 28–22 56.0% — 1,848 0 8 1978 8–9 47.1% — 1,616 0 0
22 1977 28–26 51.9% — 1,860 0 9 1979 3–13 18.8% — 1,565 0 0
23 1978 28–25 52.8% — 1,761 0 9 1980 14–13 51.9% — 1,703 0 0
24 1979 21–26 44.7% — 1,692 0 9 1981 14–17 45.2% — 1,737 0 0
25 1980 24–23 51.1% — 1,680 0 9 1982 12–14 46.2% — 1,707 0 0
26 1981 18–16 52.9% — 1,681 0 9 1983 5–16 23.8% — 1,567 0 0
27 1982 9–12 42.9% — 1,692 0 9 — — — — — — —
28 1983 1–8 11.1% — 1,597 0 9 — — — — — — —
29 1984 0–1 0.0% — 1,580 0 9 — — — — — — —
30 1985 1–2 33.3% — 1,569 0 9 — — — — — — —
31 1986 0–2 0.0% — 1,533 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Renata Tomanova Barbara Hallquist
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1970 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1971 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1973 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1972 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1974 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 1973 — — — — 17 9 26 65.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1975 — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
19 1974 — — — — 19 8 27 70.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1975 2 2 4 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1977 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1976 2 1 3 66.7% 17 7 24 70.8% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 6 6 0.0% 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 1977 1 5 6 16.7% 17 7 24 70.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 7 10 17 41.2% 1979 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1978 4 4 8 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 13 7 20 65.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 1980 7 8 15 46.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
24 1979 1 7 8 12.5% 9 6 15 60.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 1981 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 7 6 13 53.8% 0 5 5 0.0%
25 1980 5 6 11 45.5% 10 7 17 58.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 1982 7 5 12 58.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — —
26 1981 5 4 9 55.6% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1983 0 1 1 0.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1985 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1986 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 21 32 53 39.6% 130 86 216 60.2% 41 43 84 48.8% 22 47 69 31.9% — 34 38 72 47.2% 3 12 15 20.0% 22 28 50 44.0% 1 9 10 10.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Renata Tomanova Barbara Hallquist
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1970 1500 96.0 — — — — +67 -2 — 40.0% -0.50 4–0 (100%) — — +1.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1971 1499 98.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.64 1973 1516 110.1 — — — — +80 — — 66.7% +2.33 — — — +0.83
17 1972 1481 96.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — -0.01 1974 1500 97.3 — — — — +94 — — 38.5% -0.85 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +1.26
18 1973 1615 134.4 — — — — -83 +113 — 52.1% +0.38 7–2 (78%) 1–2 (33%) 106.4 +2.54 1975 1541 102.9 — — — — — — +36 60.0% +0.60 2–0 1–1 — +0.62
19 1974 1720 129.8 — — — — -209 +100 — 58.7% +0.75 7–2 (78%) 4–2 (67%) 107.8 +1.96 1976 1530 102.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.08
20 1975 1814 140.9 — — — — -168 +119 -259 54.4% +0.01 9–3 (75%) 4–3 (57%) 106.1 -2.83 1977 1578 113.0 — — — — — — — 57.1% +0.21 2–0 1–0 — +0.30
21 1976 1849 141.0 — — — — -235 +74 -173 54.5% +0.33 6–6 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 98.4 -2.94 1978 1616 117.7 — — — — +29 — -43 48.6% -0.16 3–2 (60%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.13
22 1977 1861 152.7 — — — — -166 +102 -183 52.5% +0.14 6–10 (38%) 4–7 (36%) 93.1 -7.43 1979 1566 114.8 — — — — +87 — -68 27.0% -1.76 3–4 (43%) 0–1 — -0.92
23 1978 1761 130.1 — — — — -89 +113 +14 52.9% +0.13 6–9 (40%) 6–4 (60%) 97.3 +1.25 1980 1704 131.6 — — — — -27 -213 -91 52.4% -0.19 4–5 (44%) 6–1 (86%) 104.8 -1.47
24 1979 1692 132.4 — — — — -98 +239 +54 45.5% -0.34 10–8 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 100.6 +2.72 1981 1737 128.5 — — — — -9 — -69 43.2% -0.74 8–4 (67%) 2–0 — -2.02
25 1980 1681 127.8 — — — — -128 +207 +28 51.9% +0.19 5–7 (42%) 2–3 (40%) 97.4 +0.01 1982 1708 102.3 — — — — -1 -251 -62 44.1% -0.80 5–2 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 102.9 -0.55
26 1981 1682 123.3 — — — — -26 +171 -14 51.2% +0.18 8–6 (57%) 2–3 (40%) 100.3 +0.42 1983 1568 105.1 — — — — +49 -96 +31 28.3% -1.37 1–3 (25%) 0–3 (0%) 93.9 +0.62
27 1982 1693 123.3 — — — — -75 +88 -13 44.2% -0.42 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -1.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1983 1597 97.2 — — — — — +87 — 21.1% -2.40 0–2 1–0 — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1984 1581 98.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1985 1570 101.2 — — — — — +46 — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1986 1533 90.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1948 138.0 — — — — -122 +120 -54 50.6% +0.03 70–57 (55%) 31–33 (48%) 101.2 -0.68 — 1778 121.7 — — — — +21 -189 -53 43.1% -0.66 30–22 (58%) 16–12 (57%) 106.7 -0.71

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.