H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Renata Tomanova vs Barbara Potter H2H: 0-4
Barbara Potter holds a 4–0 lead over Renata Tomanova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Barbara Potter leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Barbara Potter won the 1981 Toronto third round 7-5 5-7 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 71
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 64
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 1981 | Toronto | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Barbara Potter | 7-5 5-7 6-2 | Renata Tomanova | Match data |
| Aug 10, 1980 | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Barbara Potter | 6-2 6-3 | Renata Tomanova | Match data |
| Mar 8, 1979* | Philadelphia | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Barbara Potter | 3-6 6-2 7-5 | Renata Tomanova | Match data |
| Feb 15, 1979* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R32 | Carpet | Barbara Potter | | Renata Tomanova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renata Tomanova | — | — | — | 1,940 | 225 | 214 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Barbara Potter | #112 | #10 | 63 | 2,096 | 299 | 190 | 61.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Renata Tomanova | Barbara Potter | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1970 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1972 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 8–22 | 26.7% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1973 | 20–15 | 57.1% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 23–21 | 52.3% | — | 1,861 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1974 | 21–14 | 60.0% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 4 | 1981 | 47–23 | 67.1% | — | 1,943 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1975 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 6 | 1982 | 43–22 | 66.2% | — | 1,993 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1976 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 8 | 1983 | 28–20 | 58.3% | — | 1,851 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1977 | 28–26 | 51.9% | — | 1,854 | 0 | 9 | 1984 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #12 | 1,951 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1978 | 28–25 | 52.8% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 9 | 1985 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #15 | 1,899 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1979 | 21–26 | 44.7% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 9 | 1986 | 14–10 | 58.3% | #26 | 1,881 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1980 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 9 | 1987 | 25–13 | 65.8% | #12 | 1,894 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1981 | 18–16 | 52.9% | — | 1,682 | 0 | 9 | 1988 | 36–14 | 72.0% | #10 | 1,918 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1982 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,694 | 0 | 9 | 1989 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,845 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1983 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1985 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |