H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Renata Tomanova vs Betsy Nagelsen H2H: 2-2

Renata Tomanova and Betsy Nagelsen are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Renata Tomanova leads 2–0 on clay, while Betsy Nagelsen leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Renata Tomanova won the 1981 Berlin Open round of 32 6-0 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Renata Tomanova
GER Age 71 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main-draw meetings
Betsy Nagelsen
USA Age 69 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Renata Tomanova 6-0 6-1 Betsy Nagelsen Match data May 21, 1981* R32 Berlin Open WTA 500 Clay
Betsy Nagelsen 7-5 6-3 Renata Tomanova Match data Jun 18, 1980* R64 Eastbourne Open WTA 250 Grass
Betsy Nagelsen 6-4 6-4 Renata Tomanova Match data Dec 25, 1978 QF Australian Open Grand Slam Grass
Renata Tomanova 6-1 6-2 Betsy Nagelsen Match data Jun 3, 1976* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Renata Tomanova — — — 1,945 223 212 51.3% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Betsy Nagelsen #692 #25 28 1,890 266 324 45.1% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Renata Tomanova Betsy Nagelsen
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1970 4–4 50.0% — 1,500 0 0 1972 4–2 66.7% — 1,511 0 1
16 1971 1–1 50.0% — 1,499 0 0 1973 1–3 25.0% — 1,494 0 1
17 1972 0–2 0.0% — 1,480 0 0 1974 27–18 60.0% — 1,724 0 3
18 1973 18–14 56.2% — 1,615 0 0 1975 18–17 51.4% — 1,790 0 3
19 1974 21–13 61.8% — 1,719 0 4 1976 11–19 36.7% — 1,709 0 3
20 1975 23–16 59.0% — 1,813 0 6 1977 8–15 34.8% — 1,678 0 3
21 1976 28–22 56.0% — 1,847 0 8 1978 13–24 35.1% — 1,659 0 3
22 1977 28–26 51.9% — 1,858 0 9 1979 18–19 48.6% — 1,694 0 5
23 1978 28–25 52.8% — 1,759 0 9 1980 22–27 44.9% — 1,753 0 5
24 1979 21–26 44.7% — 1,691 0 9 1981 20–21 48.8% — 1,806 0 6
25 1980 22–22 50.0% — 1,678 0 9 1982 12–17 41.4% — 1,705 0 6
26 1981 18–16 52.9% — 1,680 0 9 1983 18–22 45.0% — 1,692 0 6
27 1982 9–12 42.9% — 1,691 0 9 1984 11–18 37.9% #77 1,630 0 6
28 1983 1–8 11.1% — 1,596 0 9 1985 14–12 53.8% #81 1,713 0 6
29 1984 0–1 0.0% — 1,580 0 9 1986 18–17 51.4% #46 1,699 0 6
30 1985 1–2 33.3% — 1,569 0 9 1987 13–15 46.4% #61 1,645 0 6
31 1986 0–2 0.0% — 1,532 0 9 1988 11–19 36.7% #109 1,585 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 1989 18–15 54.5% #45 1,662 0 6
33 — — — — — — — 1990 8–12 40.0% #96 1,639 0 6
34 — — — — — — — 1991 0–2 0.0% #337 1,607 0 6
35 — — — — — — — 1992 1–5 16.7% #418 1,561 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 1993 0–4 0.0% #394 1,510 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% #692 1,509 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Renata Tomanova Betsy Nagelsen
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1970 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1972 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
16 1971 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1973 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1972 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1974 3 2 5 60.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 4 4 0.0%
18 1973 — — — — 17 9 26 65.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1975 5 5 10 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1974 — — — — 19 8 27 70.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1976 0 2 2 0.0% 5 11 16 31.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
20 1975 2 2 4 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1977 3 3 6 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1976 2 1 3 66.7% 17 7 24 70.8% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 6 6 0.0% 1978 3 7 10 30.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3%
22 1977 1 5 6 16.7% 17 7 24 70.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 7 10 17 41.2% 1979 4 7 11 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
23 1978 4 4 8 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 13 7 20 65.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 1980 7 7 14 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 5 11 16 31.3%
24 1979 1 7 8 12.5% 9 6 15 60.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 1981 5 6 11 45.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 3 7 10 30.0%
25 1980 5 6 11 45.5% 10 7 17 58.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7%
26 1981 5 4 9 55.6% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 2 7 9 22.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 7 4 11 63.6%
27 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1984 9 7 16 56.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 7 9 22.2% — — — —
28 1983 0 1 1 0.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1985 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1986 6 10 16 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
30 1985 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1987 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
31 1986 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1988 5 13 18 27.8% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 12 10 22 54.5% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 21 32 53 39.6% 130 86 216 60.2% 41 43 84 48.8% 20 46 66 30.3% — 84 114 198 42.4% 29 59 88 33.0% 95 80 175 54.3% 35 67 102 34.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Renata Tomanova Betsy Nagelsen
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1970 1500 96.0 — — — — +67 -2 — 40.0% -0.50 4–0 (100%) — — +1.89 1972 1511 98.7 — — — — — +28 — 53.8% +0.23 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.77
16 1971 1499 98.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.64 1973 1495 98.7 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.00 0–2 1–0 — +0.55
17 1972 1481 96.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — -0.01 1974 1725 133.0 — — — — -176 -202 +77 57.7% +0.46 8–6 (57%) 5–6 (45%) 103.4 +0.58
18 1973 1615 134.4 — — — — -83 +113 — 52.1% +0.38 7–2 (78%) 1–2 (33%) 106.4 +2.79 1975 1791 125.1 — — — — -124 -166 -38 45.7% -0.44 4–4 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 101.5 -3.05
19 1974 1720 129.8 — — — — -209 +100 — 58.7% +0.75 7–2 (78%) 4–2 (67%) 107.8 +2.40 1976 1709 124.2 — — — — -65 -116 +70 41.4% -0.76 3–7 (30%) 1–1 — -1.73
20 1975 1814 140.9 — — — — -168 +118 -259 54.4% +0.01 9–3 (75%) 4–3 (57%) 106.1 -2.52 1977 1678 123.8 — — — — -30 -105 +46 37.9% -0.62 6–6 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.05
21 1976 1847 140.8 — — — — -234 +75 -172 54.5% +0.33 6–6 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 98.4 -2.73 1978 1659 129.6 — — — — -99 -85 +99 40.7% -0.58 4–10 (29%) 3–7 (30%) 92.4 -0.84
22 1977 1859 152.5 — — — — -167 +104 -182 52.5% +0.14 6–10 (38%) 4–7 (36%) 93.1 -7.11 1979 1695 122.8 — — — — -132 — +12 48.9% +0.08 8–8 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.5 +1.65
23 1978 1759 129.4 — — — — -92 +115 +15 52.9% +0.13 6–9 (40%) 6–4 (60%) 97.2 +1.55 1980 1753 130.7 — — — — -148 — +40 47.9% -0.41 7–12 (37%) 6–2 (75%) 102.2 -1.78
24 1979 1692 132.3 — — — — -101 +238 +54 45.5% -0.34 10–8 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 100.6 +2.45 1981 1806 134.9 — — — — -129 -305 +99 49.5% -0.18 8–7 (53%) 5–5 (50%) 103.7 -3.53
25 1980 1679 128.6 — — — — -147 +207 +30 51.5% +0.20 4–7 (36%) 1–3 (25%) 95.3 -0.95 1982 1705 123.2 — — — — -99 -214 +170 47.3% -0.34 5–11 (31%) 9–3 (75%) 100.0 -0.40
26 1981 1680 123.2 — — — — -37 +172 -12 51.2% +0.18 8–6 (57%) 2–3 (40%) 100.4 +0.40 1983 1693 126.7 — — — — -32 -138 +114 46.3% -0.46 7–8 (47%) 7–6 (54%) 102.2 +0.98
27 1982 1692 123.3 — — — — -86 +88 -12 44.2% -0.42 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -1.63 1984 1631 126.4 — — — — +59 -141 +117 41.4% -0.51 5–7 (42%) 7–3 (70%) 99.2 +0.69
28 1983 1597 97.2 — — — — — +86 — 21.1% -2.40 0–2 1–0 — +0.01 1985 1714 129.5 — — — — -26 — +87 54.2% +0.36 7–4 (64%) 1–2 (33%) — +1.17
29 1984 1580 98.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.09 1986 1699 131.1 — — — — -55 — +171 51.8% +0.01 6–7 (46%) 4–3 (57%) 98.8 +1.66
30 1985 1569 101.2 — — — — — +46 — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — +0.04 1987 1646 121.6 — — — — -24 — +148 46.2% 0.00 5–6 (45%) 4–5 (44%) 97.1 +1.69
31 1986 1532 90.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.34 1988 1586 116.1 — — — — -27 — +128 42.5% -0.27 4–9 (31%) 5–8 (38%) 93.3 +1.55
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1662 126.0 — — — — -56 — +96 50.6% +0.04 11–6 (65%) 3–4 (43%) 105.8 +1.48
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1640 115.0 — — — — -81 — +173 40.0% -0.60 3–2 (60%) 2–4 (33%) 100.0 +0.09
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1608 97.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — -0.01
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1561 105.4 — — — — -52 — — 26.7% -1.67 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.03
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1511 98.5 — — — — -47 — — 20.0% -2.70 0–2 0–1 — +0.17
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1509 102.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.16
Career — 1946 138.0 — — — — -126 +121 -54 50.6% +0.03 69–57 (55%) 30–33 (48%) 100.5 -0.54 — 1891 131.9 — — — — -73 -148 +94 46.5% -0.28 104–128 (45%) 70–69 (50%) 101.1 +0.27

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.