H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Renata Tomanova vs Eva Pfaff H2H: 1-0
Renata Tomanova holds a 1–0 lead over Eva Pfaff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Renata Tomanova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Renata Tomanova won the 1981 Wimbledon second round 6-2 1-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 71
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 65
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 1981* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Renata Tomanova | 6-2 1-6 6-2 | Eva Pfaff | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renata Tomanova | — | — | — | 1,940 | 225 | 214 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Eva Pfaff | #420 | #17 | 21 | 1,902 | 155 | 202 | 43.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Renata Tomanova | Eva Pfaff | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1970 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1972 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1973 | 20–15 | 57.1% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1974 | 21–14 | 60.0% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 4 | 1980 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1975 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 6 | 1981 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1976 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 8 | 1982 | 18–22 | 45.0% | — | 1,777 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1977 | 28–26 | 51.9% | — | 1,854 | 0 | 9 | 1983 | 31–21 | 59.6% | — | 1,856 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1978 | 28–25 | 52.8% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 9 | 1984 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1979 | 21–26 | 44.7% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 9 | 1985 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #39 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1980 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 9 | 1986 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #58 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1981 | 18–16 | 52.9% | — | 1,682 | 0 | 9 | 1987 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1982 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,694 | 0 | 9 | 1988 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #74 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1983 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 9 | 1989 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #104 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 9 | 1990 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #152 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1985 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 9 | 1991 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #203 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 9 | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |