H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Renata Tomanova vs Iva Budarova H2H: 1-1
Renata Tomanova and Iva Budarova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Renata Tomanova leads 1–0 on clay, while Iva Budarova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Iva Budarova won the 1983 Wimbledon first round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 71
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
TCH
Age 65
Left-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 1983* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Iva Budarova | 6-1 6-3 | Renata Tomanova | Match data |
| May 18, 1978* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Renata Tomanova | 4-6 7-6 6-2 | Iva Budarova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renata Tomanova | — | — | — | 1,940 | 225 | 214 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Iva Budarova | #661 | #25 | 9 | 1,859 | 148 | 206 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Renata Tomanova | Iva Budarova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1970 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1972 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1973 | 20–15 | 57.1% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 15–13 | 53.6% | — | 1,655 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 1974 | 21–14 | 60.0% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 4 | 1980 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 1975 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 6 | 1981 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1976 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 8 | 1982 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,656 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1977 | 28–26 | 51.9% | — | 1,854 | 0 | 9 | 1983 | 33–23 | 58.9% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1978 | 28–25 | 52.8% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 9 | 1984 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #56 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1979 | 21–26 | 44.7% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 9 | 1985 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #68 | 1,727 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1980 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 9 | 1986 | 11–24 | 31.4% | #112 | 1,587 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1981 | 18–16 | 52.9% | — | 1,682 | 0 | 9 | 1987 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,563 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1982 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,694 | 0 | 9 | 1988 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #105 | 1,586 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1983 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 9 | 1989 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,560 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 9 | 1990 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #186 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1985 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |