H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Renata Tomanova vs Kate Latham H2H: 0-2

Kate Latham holds a 2–0 lead over Renata Tomanova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kate Latham leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kate Latham won the 1979 Phoenix round of 32 6-1 1-6 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Renata Tomanova
GER Age 71 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Kate Latham
USA Age 74

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kate Latham 6-1 1-6 7-6 Renata Tomanova Match data Oct 13, 1979* R32 Phoenix WTA 250 Hard
Kate Latham 6-2 6-1 Renata Tomanova Match data Mar 8, 1975* SF Jacksonville WTA 250 —

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Renata Tomanova — — — 1,948 225 213 51.4% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Kate Latham — — — 1,865 198 202 49.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Renata Tomanova Kate Latham
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1970 4–4 50.0% — 1,500 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1971 1–1 50.0% — 1,499 0 0 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
17 1972 0–2 0.0% — 1,480 0 0 1970 1–3 25.0% — 1,475 0 0
18 1973 18–14 56.2% — 1,615 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1974 21–13 61.8% — 1,719 0 4 1972 3–3 50.0% — 1,502 0 0
20 1975 23–16 59.0% — 1,813 0 6 1973 6–7 46.2% — 1,587 0 0
21 1976 28–22 56.0% — 1,848 0 8 1974 40–16 71.4% — 1,828 0 3
22 1977 28–26 51.9% — 1,860 0 9 1975 15–20 42.9% — 1,684 0 3
23 1978 28–25 52.8% — 1,761 0 9 1976 4–2 66.7% — 1,676 0 3
24 1979 21–26 44.7% — 1,692 0 9 1977 15–12 55.6% — 1,749 0 3
25 1980 24–23 51.1% — 1,680 0 9 1978 13–17 43.3% — 1,662 0 3
26 1981 18–16 52.9% — 1,681 0 9 1979 21–23 47.7% — 1,853 0 3
27 1982 9–12 42.9% — 1,692 0 9 1980 23–22 51.1% — 1,750 0 4
28 1983 1–8 11.1% — 1,597 0 9 1981 21–20 51.2% — 1,775 0 5
29 1984 0–1 0.0% — 1,580 0 9 1982 24–28 46.2% — 1,685 0 5
30 1985 1–2 33.3% — 1,569 0 9 1983 9–16 36.0% — 1,624 0 6
31 1986 0–2 0.0% — 1,533 0 9 1984 0–11 0.0% — 1,493 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 1985 3–1 75.0% — 1,527 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Renata Tomanova Kate Latham
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1970 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1971 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1969 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1972 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1970 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1973 — — — — 17 9 26 65.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1974 — — — — 19 8 27 70.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1975 2 2 4 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1973 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — —
21 1976 2 1 3 66.7% 17 7 24 70.8% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 6 6 0.0% 1974 15 5 20 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 17 6 23 73.9% 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1977 1 5 6 16.7% 17 7 24 70.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 7 10 17 41.2% 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
23 1978 4 4 8 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 13 7 20 65.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 1976 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1979 1 7 8 12.5% 9 6 15 60.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 1977 4 4 8 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1980 5 6 11 45.5% 10 7 17 58.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
26 1981 5 4 9 55.6% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1979 8 7 15 53.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 10 16 37.5%
27 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1980 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 9 12 25.0%
28 1983 0 1 1 0.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1981 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 10 16 37.5%
29 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1982 9 7 16 56.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 7 9 16 43.8%
30 1985 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1983 6 8 14 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 1986 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1984 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career — 21 32 53 39.6% 130 86 216 60.2% 41 43 84 48.8% 22 47 69 31.9% — 70 67 137 51.1% 26 38 64 40.6% 41 33 74 55.4% 27 55 82 32.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Renata Tomanova Kate Latham
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1970 1500 96.0 — — — — +67 -2 — 40.0% -0.50 4–0 (100%) — — +1.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1971 1499 98.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.64 1969 1489 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.07
17 1972 1481 96.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — -0.01 1970 1476 93.6 — — — — +10 — — 25.0% -2.63 — — — +0.42
18 1973 1615 134.4 — — — — -83 +113 — 52.1% +0.38 7–2 (78%) 1–2 (33%) 106.4 +2.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1974 1720 129.8 — — — — -209 +100 — 58.7% +0.75 7–2 (78%) 4–2 (67%) 107.8 +1.96 1972 1503 99.9 — — — — — +39 — 45.5% -0.54 0–1 — — +0.61
20 1975 1814 140.9 — — — — -168 +119 -259 54.4% +0.01 9–3 (75%) 4–3 (57%) 106.1 -2.83 1973 1587 129.0 — — — — -41 — 0 48.3% +0.14 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.26
21 1976 1849 141.0 — — — — -235 +74 -173 54.5% +0.33 6–6 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 98.4 -2.94 1974 1828 140.0 — — — — -65 -181 -31 68.9% +1.55 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 99.0 +3.17
22 1977 1861 152.7 — — — — -166 +102 -183 52.5% +0.14 6–10 (38%) 4–7 (36%) 93.1 -7.43 1975 1685 132.9 — — — — +12 -76 — 45.3% -0.03 1–4 (20%) 1–7 (13%) 89.6 -0.71
23 1978 1761 130.1 — — — — -89 +113 +14 52.9% +0.13 6–9 (40%) 6–4 (60%) 97.3 +1.25 1976 1676 107.6 — — — — +22 — — 57.1% +1.00 2–0 1–0 — +2.34
24 1979 1692 132.4 — — — — -98 +239 +54 45.5% -0.34 10–8 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 100.6 +2.72 1977 1750 140.9 — — — — -8 -120 — 54.2% +0.34 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) 103.9 -1.23
25 1980 1681 127.8 — — — — -128 +207 +28 51.9% +0.19 5–7 (42%) 2–3 (40%) 97.4 +0.01 1978 1663 118.4 — — — — +3 -12 +67 43.3% -0.58 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 105.3 +1.97
26 1981 1682 123.3 — — — — -26 +171 -14 51.2% +0.18 8–6 (57%) 2–3 (40%) 100.3 +0.42 1979 1853 149.7 — — — — -20 -164 -98 46.0% -0.27 8–6 (57%) 4–4 (50%) 103.8 -2.28
27 1982 1693 123.3 — — — — -75 +88 -13 44.2% -0.42 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -1.67 1980 1750 133.2 — — — — -27 — +15 51.5% +0.05 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 96.7 -1.93
28 1983 1597 97.2 — — — — — +87 — 21.1% -2.40 0–2 1–0 — -0.02 1981 1776 142.9 — — — — -18 — +4 52.1% +0.14 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -1.97
29 1984 1581 98.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.09 1982 1686 128.3 — — — — +50 -103 +34 44.5% -0.56 10–5 (67%) 5–2 (71%) 106.2 -0.20
30 1985 1570 101.2 — — — — — +46 — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — +0.04 1983 1624 115.1 — — — — +52 -49 +72 40.3% -0.61 7–9 (44%) 3–6 (33%) 96.8 +0.86
31 1986 1533 90.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.38 1984 1493 91.7 — — — — +52 +30 — 8.3% -3.08 0–2 0–1 — +0.46
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1527 102.8 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.40 2–0 1–0 — +0.05
Career — 1948 138.0 — — — — -122 +120 -54 50.6% +0.03 70–57 (55%) 31–33 (48%) 101.2 -0.68 — 1866 138.2 — — — — -3 -78 -9 49.2% -0.03 56–61 (48%) 41–38 (52%) 101.2 +0.31

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.