H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Renata Tomanova vs Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel H2H: 0-1

Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel holds a 1–0 lead over Renata Tomanova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel won the 1983 Lugano round of 32 6-0 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Renata Tomanova
GER Age 71 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel
USA Age 59 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel 6-0 6-1 Renata Tomanova Match data May 12, 1983* R32 Lugano WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Renata Tomanova — — — 1,945 223 212 51.3% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel — #9 — 2,082 277 213 56.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Renata Tomanova Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1980 4–5 44.4% — 1,505 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1981 27–14 65.9% — 1,802 0 2
15 1970 4–4 50.0% — 1,500 0 0 1982 30–19 61.2% — 1,872 0 2
16 1971 1–1 50.0% — 1,499 0 0 1983 29–17 63.0% — 1,844 0 2
17 1972 0–2 0.0% — 1,480 0 0 1984 27–19 58.7% — 1,851 0 2
18 1973 18–14 56.2% — 1,615 0 0 1985 41–16 71.9% — 1,975 0 3
19 1974 21–13 61.8% — 1,719 0 4 1986 34–16 68.0% #9 1,974 0 4
20 1975 23–16 59.0% — 1,813 0 6 1987 15–8 65.2% — 1,901 0 4
21 1976 28–22 56.0% — 1,847 0 8 1988 5–8 38.5% — 1,811 0 4
22 1977 28–26 51.9% — 1,858 0 9 1989 16–15 51.6% — 1,788 0 4
23 1978 28–25 52.8% — 1,759 0 9 1990 15–18 45.5% — 1,697 0 4
24 1979 21–26 44.7% — 1,691 0 9 1991 7–15 31.8% — 1,589 0 4
25 1980 22–22 50.0% — 1,678 0 9 1992 10–15 40.0% — 1,586 0 4
26 1981 18–16 52.9% — 1,680 0 9 1993 12–13 48.0% — 1,628 0 4
27 1982 9–12 42.9% — 1,691 0 9 1994 1–5 16.7% — 1,585 0 4
28 1983 1–8 11.1% — 1,596 0 9 1995 1–2 33.3% — 1,609 0 4
29 1984 0–1 0.0% — 1,580 0 9 1996 3–8 27.3% — 1,554 0 4
30 1985 1–2 33.3% — 1,569 0 9 — — — — — — —
31 1986 0–2 0.0% — 1,532 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Renata Tomanova Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 14 6 20 70.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
15 1970 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1982 7 3 10 70.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
16 1971 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1983 8 5 13 61.5% 18 7 25 72.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
17 1972 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1984 6 3 9 66.7% 11 7 18 61.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
18 1973 — — — — 17 9 26 65.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1985 15 5 20 75.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 8 2 10 80.0% 9 5 14 64.3%
19 1974 — — — — 19 8 27 70.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1986 7 4 11 63.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 15 6 21 71.4%
20 1975 2 2 4 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1987 5 2 7 71.4% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1976 2 1 3 66.7% 17 7 24 70.8% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 6 6 0.0% 1988 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1977 1 5 6 16.7% 17 7 24 70.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 7 10 17 41.2% 1989 8 7 15 53.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
23 1978 4 4 8 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 13 7 20 65.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 1979 1 7 8 12.5% 9 6 15 60.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 1991 3 9 12 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 1980 5 6 11 45.5% 10 7 17 58.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1992 5 8 13 38.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 1981 5 4 9 55.6% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 5 7 12 41.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1983 0 1 1 0.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1995 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 1985 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1986 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 21 32 53 39.6% 130 86 216 60.2% 41 43 84 48.8% 20 46 66 30.3% — 99 84 183 54.1% 98 59 157 62.4% 27 24 51 52.9% 49 43 92 53.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Renata Tomanova Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1505 105.8 — — — — — — — 42.1% -0.42 1–0 1–1 — -0.05
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1803 134.8 — — — — -10 -130 -221 61.5% +1.17 9–5 (64%) 3–3 (50%) 105.4 +2.37
15 1970 1500 96.0 — — — — +67 -2 — 40.0% -0.50 4–0 (100%) — — +1.89 1982 1872 149.0 — — — — -69 -6 -215 60.4% +0.54 6–4 (60%) 7–2 (78%) 107.8 -4.11
16 1971 1499 98.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.64 1983 1845 139.2 — — — — -45 +103 -185 58.6% +0.96 12–7 (63%) 1–7 (13%) 99.3 +3.06
17 1972 1481 96.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — -0.01 1984 1851 137.1 — — — — -38 +58 -143 55.9% +0.22 9–5 (64%) 3–1 (75%) 103.9 +0.60
18 1973 1615 134.4 — — — — -83 +113 — 52.1% +0.38 7–2 (78%) 1–2 (33%) 106.4 +2.79 1985 1976 158.8 — — — — -30 -57 -101 70.6% +1.53 9–2 (82%) 3–5 (38%) 105.7 -2.76
19 1974 1720 129.8 — — — — -209 +100 — 58.7% +0.75 7–2 (78%) 4–2 (67%) 107.8 +2.40 1986 1975 157.9 — — — — -2 +51 — 63.6% +1.08 8–6 (57%) 7–6 (54%) 101.3 -3.03
20 1975 1814 140.9 — — — — -168 +118 -259 54.4% +0.01 9–3 (75%) 4–3 (57%) 106.1 -2.52 1987 1902 131.1 — — — — +35 +51 — 61.4% +0.60 7–4 (64%) 4–1 (80%) 100.0 -0.03
21 1976 1847 140.8 — — — — -234 +75 -172 54.5% +0.33 6–6 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 98.4 -2.73 1988 1812 123.2 — — — — +51 — — 44.4% -0.67 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -1.23
22 1977 1859 152.5 — — — — -167 +104 -182 52.5% +0.14 6–10 (38%) 4–7 (36%) 93.1 -7.11 1989 1788 141.2 — — — — +17 +110 -20 50.0% -0.29 7–3 (70%) 3–1 (75%) 103.8 -4.08
23 1978 1759 129.4 — — — — -92 +115 +15 52.9% +0.13 6–9 (40%) 6–4 (60%) 97.2 +1.55 1990 1698 132.2 — — — — +65 +102 — 44.7% -0.36 8–4 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 101.6 +0.06
24 1979 1692 132.3 — — — — -101 +238 +54 45.5% -0.34 10–8 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 100.6 +2.45 1991 1590 119.7 — — — — +56 +172 — 36.7% -0.67 3–4 (43%) 0–5 (0%) 93.8 +0.93
25 1980 1679 128.6 — — — — -147 +207 +30 51.5% +0.20 4–7 (36%) 1–3 (25%) 95.3 -0.95 1992 1586 115.2 — — — — -5 +158 +152 45.2% -0.50 4–8 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 92.9 +1.34
26 1981 1680 123.2 — — — — -37 +172 -12 51.2% +0.18 8–6 (57%) 2–3 (40%) 100.4 +0.40 1993 1629 119.3 — — — — -57 +111 — 45.9% -0.25 7–4 (64%) 1–4 (20%) 101.8 +0.90
27 1982 1692 123.3 — — — — -86 +88 -12 44.2% -0.42 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -1.63 1994 1586 107.2 — — — — -57 — — 21.4% -2.00 1–1 — — -0.20
28 1983 1597 97.2 — — — — — +86 — 21.1% -2.40 0–2 1–0 — +0.01 1995 1609 114.1 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.60 1–0 1–0 — -0.56
29 1984 1580 98.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.09 1996 1555 105.6 — — — — -34 +118 +211 35.7% -0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 94.7 +0.42
30 1985 1569 101.2 — — — — — +46 — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1986 1532 90.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1946 138.0 — — — — -126 +121 -54 50.6% +0.03 69–57 (55%) 30–33 (48%) 100.5 -0.54 — 2083 145.9 — — — — -6 +45 -86 55.0% +0.38 95–63 (60%) 41–44 (48%) 102.1 -1.30

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.