H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Renata Tomanova vs Lea Pericoli H2H: 0-1

Lea Pericoli holds a 1–0 lead over Renata Tomanova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lea Pericoli leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lea Pericoli won the 1972 Italian Open round of 32 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Renata Tomanova
GER Age 71 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Lea Pericoli
ITA Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lea Pericoli 6-2 6-1 Renata Tomanova Match data Apr 5, 1972* R32 Italian Open WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Renata Tomanova — — — 1,945 223 212 51.3% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Lea Pericoli — — — 1,772 58 51 53.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Renata Tomanova Lea Pericoli
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1970 4–4 50.0% — 1,500 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1971 1–1 50.0% — 1,499 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1972 0–2 0.0% — 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1973 18–14 56.2% — 1,615 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1974 21–13 61.8% — 1,719 0 4 — — — — — — —
20 1975 23–16 59.0% — 1,813 0 6 — — — — — — —
21 1976 28–22 56.0% — 1,847 0 8 — — — — — — —
22 1977 28–26 51.9% — 1,858 0 9 — — — — — — —
23 1978 28–25 52.8% — 1,759 0 9 — — — — — — —
24 1979 21–26 44.7% — 1,691 0 9 — — — — — — —
25 1980 22–22 50.0% — 1,678 0 9 — — — — — — —
26 1981 18–16 52.9% — 1,680 0 9 — — — — — — —
27 1982 9–12 42.9% — 1,691 0 9 — — — — — — —
28 1983 1–8 11.1% — 1,596 0 9 — — — — — — —
29 1984 0–1 0.0% — 1,580 0 9 — — — — — — —
30 1985 1–2 33.3% — 1,569 0 9 — — — — — — —
31 1986 0–2 0.0% — 1,532 0 9 — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — 1968 8–5 61.5% — 1,586 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 1969 15–7 68.2% — 1,705 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 1970 11–7 61.1% — 1,756 0 3
36 — — — — — — — 1971 9–8 52.9% — 1,752 0 3
37 — — — — — — — 1972 3–6 33.3% — 1,659 0 3
38 — — — — — — — 1973 4–3 57.1% — 1,648 0 3
39 — — — — — — — 1974 6–6 50.0% — 1,641 0 3
40 — — — — — — — 1975 2–7 22.2% — 1,554 0 3
41 — — — — — — — 1976 0–2 0.0% — 1,548 0 3

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Renata Tomanova Lea Pericoli
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1970 1500 96.0 — — — — +67 -2 — 40.0% -0.50 4–0 (100%) — — +1.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1971 1499 98.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1972 1481 96.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1973 1615 134.4 — — — — -83 +113 — 52.1% +0.38 7–2 (78%) 1–2 (33%) 106.4 +2.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1974 1720 129.8 — — — — -209 +100 — 58.7% +0.75 7–2 (78%) 4–2 (67%) 107.8 +2.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1975 1814 140.9 — — — — -168 +118 -259 54.4% +0.01 9–3 (75%) 4–3 (57%) 106.1 -2.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1976 1847 140.8 — — — — -234 +75 -172 54.5% +0.33 6–6 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 98.4 -2.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1977 1859 152.5 — — — — -167 +104 -182 52.5% +0.14 6–10 (38%) 4–7 (36%) 93.1 -7.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1978 1759 129.4 — — — — -92 +115 +15 52.9% +0.13 6–9 (40%) 6–4 (60%) 97.2 +1.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1979 1692 132.3 — — — — -101 +238 +54 45.5% -0.34 10–8 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 100.6 +2.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1980 1679 128.6 — — — — -147 +207 +30 51.5% +0.20 4–7 (36%) 1–3 (25%) 95.3 -0.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1981 1680 123.2 — — — — -37 +172 -12 51.2% +0.18 8–6 (57%) 2–3 (40%) 100.4 +0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1982 1692 123.3 — — — — -86 +88 -12 44.2% -0.42 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -1.63 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1983 1597 97.2 — — — — — +86 — 21.1% -2.40 0–2 1–0 — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1984 1580 98.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1985 1569 101.2 — — — — — +46 — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1986 1532 90.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1586 120.0 — — — — +5 +12 — 70.8% +1.92 1–1 — — +0.13
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1705 134.1 — — — — — +26 — 67.3% +1.55 2–3 (40%) — — -1.00
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1757 135.6 — — — — — -3 -150 60.5% +1.24 3–1 (75%) — — -0.73
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1752 125.6 — — — — — +1 — 50.0% +0.08 3–1 (75%) — — -0.10
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1659 111.6 — — — — — +28 — 38.1% -0.48 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.57
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1648 114.4 — — — — — +17 — 80.0% +2.50 — — — +1.43
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1642 116.2 — — — — — +20 — 51.7% +0.03 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 99.2 +0.98
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1555 100.4 — — — — — +15 — 33.3% -1.19 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +1.40
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1548 102.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.12
Career — 1946 138.0 — — — — -126 +121 -54 50.6% +0.03 69–57 (55%) 30–33 (48%) 100.5 -0.54 — 1773 132.2 — — — — +5 +14 -150 56.0% +0.67 12–14 (46%) 3–3 (50%) 96.6 +2.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.