H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Renata Tomanova vs Li Qiao Yu H2H: 0-2
Li Qiao Yu holds a 2–0 lead over Renata Tomanova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Li Qiao Yu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Li Qiao Yu won the 1980 Kyoto final 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 1980* | Kyoto | WTA 250 | F | — | Li Qiao Yu | 6-4 6-4 | Renata Tomanova | Match data |
| Oct 24, 1980* | Tokyo Japan Open | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Li Qiao Yu | 4-6 6-4 6-0 | Renata Tomanova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renata Tomanova | — | — | — | 1,940 | 225 | 214 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Li Qiao Yu | — | — | — | 1,611 | 8 | 4 | 66.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Renata Tomanova | Li Qiao Yu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1970 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 7–2 | 77.8% | — | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 1 |
| 1972 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1973 | 20–15 | 57.1% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1974 | 21–14 | 60.0% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1975 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1976 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1977 | 28–26 | 51.9% | — | 1,854 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1978 | 28–25 | 52.8% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1979 | 21–26 | 44.7% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1980 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 18–16 | 52.9% | — | 1,682 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,694 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |