H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Renata Tomanova vs Marcie Louie H2H: 2-0

Renata Tomanova holds a 2–0 lead over Marcie Louie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Renata Tomanova leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Renata Tomanova won the 1979 Carlsbad round of 32 6-4 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Renata Tomanova
GER Age 71 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Marcie Louie
USA Age 73

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Renata Tomanova 6-4 6-0 Marcie Louie Match data Mar 31, 1979* R32 Carlsbad WTA 500 Hard
Renata Tomanova 7-5 7-6 Marcie Louie Match data Apr 1, 1977* R32 Hilton Head WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Renata Tomanova — — — 1,945 223 212 51.3% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Marcie Louie — — — 1,865 103 141 42.2% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Renata Tomanova Marcie Louie
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1968 1–2 33.3% — 1,491 0 0
15 1970 4–4 50.0% — 1,500 0 0 1969 4–1 80.0% — 1,545 0 1
16 1971 1–1 50.0% — 1,499 0 0 1970 3–3 50.0% — 1,564 0 2
17 1972 0–2 0.0% — 1,480 0 0 1971 4–3 57.1% — 1,593 0 3
18 1973 18–14 56.2% — 1,615 0 0 1972 19–20 48.7% — 1,699 0 3
19 1974 21–13 61.8% — 1,719 0 4 1973 7–20 25.9% — 1,626 0 3
20 1975 23–16 59.0% — 1,813 0 6 1974 11–17 39.3% — 1,684 0 3
21 1976 28–22 56.0% — 1,847 0 8 1975 16–15 51.6% — 1,784 0 4
22 1977 28–26 51.9% — 1,858 0 9 1976 13–16 44.8% — 1,787 0 4
23 1978 28–25 52.8% — 1,759 0 9 1977 11–22 33.3% — 1,649 0 4
24 1979 21–26 44.7% — 1,691 0 9 1978 0–2 0.0% — 1,601 0 4
25 1980 22–22 50.0% — 1,678 0 9 1979 2–5 28.6% — 1,609 0 4
26 1981 18–16 52.9% — 1,680 0 9 1980 10–10 50.0% — 1,609 0 4
27 1982 9–12 42.9% — 1,691 0 9 1981 2–3 40.0% — 1,609 0 4
28 1983 1–8 11.1% — 1,596 0 9 1982 0–2 0.0% — 1,576 0 4
29 1984 0–1 0.0% — 1,580 0 9 — — — — — — —
30 1985 1–2 33.3% — 1,569 0 9 — — — — — — —
31 1986 0–2 0.0% — 1,532 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Renata Tomanova Marcie Louie
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1970 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1969 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1971 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1970 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1972 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1971 2 0 2 100.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
18 1973 — — — — 17 9 26 65.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1972 1 4 5 20.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 11 6 17 64.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
19 1974 — — — — 19 8 27 70.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1973 2 4 6 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 8 11 27.3%
20 1975 2 2 4 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1974 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 8 15 46.7%
21 1976 2 1 3 66.7% 17 7 24 70.8% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 6 6 0.0% 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 9 4 13 69.2% — — — — 4 6 10 40.0%
22 1977 1 5 6 16.7% 17 7 24 70.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 7 10 17 41.2% 1976 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 8 12 33.3%
23 1978 4 4 8 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 13 7 20 65.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 1977 3 5 8 37.5% 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — 5 8 13 38.5%
24 1979 1 7 8 12.5% 9 6 15 60.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 1978 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 1980 5 6 11 45.5% 10 7 17 58.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1979 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1981 5 4 9 55.6% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1981 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1983 0 1 1 0.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1982 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1985 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1986 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 21 32 53 39.6% 130 86 216 60.2% 41 43 84 48.8% 20 46 66 30.3% — 28 41 69 40.6% 32 35 67 47.8% 13 18 31 41.9% 26 44 70 37.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Renata Tomanova Marcie Louie
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1968 1492 100.8 — — — — +9 — — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — -0.04
15 1970 1500 96.0 — — — — +67 -2 — 40.0% -0.50 4–0 (100%) — — +1.89 1969 1545 108.9 — — — — +74 — — 72.7% +1.73 1–0 — — +0.89
16 1971 1499 98.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.64 1970 1565 106.0 — — — — +51 — — 46.2% +0.08 1–0 1–1 — +0.63
17 1972 1481 96.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — -0.01 1971 1593 107.1 — — — — — — -48 50.0% -0.42 — — — +1.18
18 1973 1615 134.4 — — — — -83 +113 — 52.1% +0.38 7–2 (78%) 1–2 (33%) 106.4 +2.79 1972 1699 128.6 — — — — -98 -107 +10 47.1% -0.29 5–2 (71%) 1–2 (33%) 103.2 -3.23
19 1974 1720 129.8 — — — — -209 +100 — 58.7% +0.75 7–2 (78%) 4–2 (67%) 107.8 +2.40 1973 1627 126.7 — — — — -36 -91 — 24.6% -1.54 3–2 (60%) 3–4 (43%) 100.9 -3.41
20 1975 1814 140.9 — — — — -168 +118 -259 54.4% +0.01 9–3 (75%) 4–3 (57%) 106.1 -2.52 1974 1684 131.0 — — — — -38 -120 — 40.0% -0.75 5–4 (56%) 4–1 (80%) 105.8 -1.83
21 1976 1847 140.8 — — — — -234 +75 -172 54.5% +0.33 6–6 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 98.4 -2.73 1975 1784 141.4 — — — — -69 -51 — 49.3% -0.27 4–3 (57%) 6–1 (86%) 106.0 -1.61
22 1977 1859 152.5 — — — — -167 +104 -182 52.5% +0.14 6–10 (38%) 4–7 (36%) 93.1 -7.11 1976 1788 133.0 — — — — -63 -23 -148 45.2% -0.10 6–2 (75%) 2–7 (22%) 101.6 -2.81
23 1978 1759 129.4 — — — — -92 +115 +15 52.9% +0.13 6–9 (40%) 6–4 (60%) 97.2 +1.55 1977 1649 127.8 — — — — +26 +9 — 35.1% -1.01 6–5 (55%) 3–6 (33%) 99.4 -0.50
24 1979 1692 132.3 — — — — -101 +238 +54 45.5% -0.34 10–8 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 100.6 +2.45 1978 1602 95.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.25 — — — +0.67
25 1980 1679 128.6 — — — — -147 +207 +30 51.5% +0.20 4–7 (36%) 1–3 (25%) 95.3 -0.95 1979 1610 120.6 — — — — +45 — — 31.3% -1.81 1–1 — — -0.60
26 1981 1680 123.2 — — — — -37 +172 -12 51.2% +0.18 8–6 (57%) 2–3 (40%) 100.4 +0.40 1980 1609 110.6 — — — — +2 +54 — 47.7% -0.20 3–3 (50%) 0–1 — +0.67
27 1982 1692 123.3 — — — — -86 +88 -12 44.2% -0.42 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -1.63 1981 1609 104.8 — — — — +37 — — 36.4% -1.27 1–0 2–0 — +0.25
28 1983 1597 97.2 — — — — — +86 — 21.1% -2.40 0–2 1–0 — +0.01 1982 1576 93.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.12
29 1984 1580 98.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1985 1569 101.2 — — — — — +46 — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1986 1532 90.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1946 138.0 — — — — -126 +121 -54 50.6% +0.03 69–57 (55%) 30–33 (48%) 100.5 -0.54 — 1866 133.0 — — — — -23 -46 -24 41.3% -0.61 36–23 (61%) 22–23 (49%) 108.5 -3.96

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.