H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Renata Tomanova vs Marcie Louie H2H: 2-0
Renata Tomanova holds a 2–0 lead over Marcie Louie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Renata Tomanova leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Renata Tomanova won the 1979 Carlsbad third round 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 1979* | Carlsbad | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Renata Tomanova | 6-4 6-0 | Marcie Louie | Match data |
| Apr 1, 1977* | Hilton Head | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Renata Tomanova | 7-5 7-6 | Marcie Louie | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renata Tomanova | — | — | — | 1,940 | 225 | 214 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Marcie Louie | — | — | — | 1,867 | 103 | 141 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Renata Tomanova | Marcie Louie | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1970 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 4–1 | 80.0% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 1972 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | 1973 | 20–15 | 57.1% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 19–20 | 48.7% | — | 1,696 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 1974 | 21–14 | 60.0% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 4 | 1973 | 7–20 | 25.9% | — | 1,637 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 1975 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 6 | 1974 | 11–17 | 39.3% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1976 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 8 | 1975 | 16–15 | 51.6% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1977 | 28–26 | 51.9% | — | 1,854 | 0 | 9 | 1976 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,783 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1978 | 28–25 | 52.8% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 9 | 1977 | 11–22 | 33.3% | — | 1,646 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1979 | 21–26 | 44.7% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 9 | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1980 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 9 | 1979 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1981 | 18–16 | 52.9% | — | 1,682 | 0 | 9 | 1980 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1982 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,694 | 0 | 9 | 1981 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1983 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 9 | 1982 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1985 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |