H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Renata Tomanova vs Marie Pinterova H2H: 2-2
Renata Tomanova and Marie Pinterova are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on clay. Most recently, Renata Tomanova won the 1978 Rome fourth round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 71
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 79
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 1978* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Renata Tomanova | 6-4 6-3 | Marie Pinterova | Match data |
| Jun 10, 1975* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Renata Tomanova | 6-2 6-2 | Marie Pinterova | Match data |
| May 28, 1974* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Marie Pinterova | 6-2 6-2 | Renata Tomanova | Match data |
| Sep 8, 1973* | Ostrava | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Marie Pinterova | 6-1 6-3 | Renata Tomanova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renata Tomanova | — | — | — | 1,940 | 225 | 214 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Marie Pinterova | — | — | — | 1,782 | 136 | 147 | 48.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Renata Tomanova | Marie Pinterova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1970 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1972 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1973 | 20–15 | 57.1% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1974 | 21–14 | 60.0% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1975 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1976 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 8 | 1968 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1977 | 28–26 | 51.9% | — | 1,854 | 0 | 9 | 1969 | 16–7 | 69.6% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1978 | 28–25 | 52.8% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 9 | 1970 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1979 | 21–26 | 44.7% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 9 | 1971 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1980 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 9 | 1972 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 1981 | 18–16 | 52.9% | — | 1,682 | 0 | 9 | 1973 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 1982 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,694 | 0 | 9 | 1974 | 14–9 | 60.9% | — | 1,711 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 1983 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 9 | 1975 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1985 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 9 | 1977 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 9 | 1978 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 37–18 | 67.3% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 11 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 12 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 3–16 | 15.8% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 12 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 12 |