H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Renata Tomanova vs Mary Lou Piatek H2H: 0-1

Mary Lou Piatek holds a 1–0 lead over Renata Tomanova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mary Lou Piatek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mary Lou Piatek won the 1981 Tampa round of 16 3-6 6-0 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Renata Tomanova
GER Age 71 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Mary Lou Piatek
USA

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mary Lou Piatek 3-6 6-0 6-2 Renata Tomanova Match data Oct 9, 1981* R16 Tampa WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Renata Tomanova — — — 1,948 225 213 51.4% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Mary Lou Piatek — — — 1,938 157 207 43.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Renata Tomanova Mary Lou Piatek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1970 4–4 50.0% — 1,500 0 0 1978 0–1 0.0% — 1,499 0 0
1971 1–1 50.0% — 1,499 0 0 1979 3–5 37.5% — 1,547 0 0
1972 0–2 0.0% — 1,480 0 0 1980 20–13 60.6% — 1,762 0 0
1973 18–14 56.2% — 1,615 0 0 1981 30–22 57.7% — 1,874 0 1
1974 21–13 61.8% — 1,719 0 4 1982 18–21 46.2% — 1,793 0 1
1975 23–16 59.0% — 1,813 0 6 1983 12–20 37.5% — 1,721 0 1
1976 28–22 56.0% — 1,848 0 8 1984 18–20 47.4% — 1,704 0 2
1977 28–26 51.9% — 1,860 0 9 1985 14–18 43.8% — 1,678 0 2
1978 28–25 52.8% — 1,761 0 9 1986 8–15 34.8% — 1,618 0 2
1979 21–26 44.7% — 1,692 0 9 1987 6–12 33.3% — 1,594 0 2
1980 24–23 51.1% — 1,680 0 9 1988 6–16 27.3% — 1,542 0 2
1981 18–16 52.9% — 1,681 0 9 1989 7–15 31.8% — 1,592 0 2
1982 9–12 42.9% — 1,692 0 9 1990 8–11 42.1% — 1,611 0 2
1983 1–8 11.1% — 1,597 0 9 1991 5–8 38.5% — 1,629 0 2
1984 0–1 0.0% — 1,580 0 9 1992 1–8 11.1% — 1,560 0 2
1985 1–2 33.3% — 1,569 0 9 1993 1–2 33.3% — 1,554 0 2
1986 0–2 0.0% — 1,533 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Renata Tomanova Mary Lou Piatek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1970 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1978 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
1971 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
1972 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1980 5 3 8 62.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 12 7 19 63.2%
1973 — — — — 17 9 26 65.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1981 15 5 20 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 7 12 41.7%
1974 — — — — 19 8 27 70.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1982 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 13 11 24 54.2%
1975 2 2 4 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1983 5 6 11 45.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
1976 2 1 3 66.7% 17 7 24 70.8% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 6 6 0.0% 1984 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 5 9 44.4%
1977 1 5 6 16.7% 17 7 24 70.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 7 10 17 41.2% 1985 7 11 18 38.9% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0%
1978 4 4 8 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 13 7 20 65.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 1986 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0%
1979 1 7 8 12.5% 9 6 15 60.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 1987 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
1980 5 6 11 45.5% 10 7 17 58.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 1988 4 9 13 30.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
1981 5 4 9 55.6% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 7 9 16 43.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
1982 1 2 3 33.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1990 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
1983 0 1 1 0.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1991 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1992 0 6 6 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
1985 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1993 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
1986 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 21 32 53 39.6% 130 86 216 60.2% 41 43 84 48.8% 22 47 69 31.9% Career 75 85 160 46.9% 17 32 49 34.7% 12 29 41 29.3% 53 61 114 46.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Renata Tomanova Mary Lou Piatek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1970 1500 96.0 — — — — +67 -2 — 40.0% -0.50 4–0 (100%) — — +1.89 1978 1499 106.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.11
1971 1499 98.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.64 1979 1547 118.3 — — — — +98 — — 42.1% -0.89 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.12
1972 1481 96.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — -0.01 1980 1763 137.4 — — — — +9 -186 — 57.7% +0.61 4–3 (57%) 3–0 (100%) — +0.65
1973 1615 134.4 — — — — -83 +113 — 52.1% +0.38 7–2 (78%) 1–2 (33%) 106.4 +2.54 1981 1875 146.3 — — — — +65 -198 -301 56.7% +0.48 8–10 (44%) 6–5 (55%) 100.9 -2.75
1974 1720 129.8 — — — — -209 +100 — 58.7% +0.75 7–2 (78%) 4–2 (67%) 107.8 +1.96 1982 1794 142.2 — — — — +59 -196 -212 47.1% -0.08 4–5 (44%) 2–3 (40%) 96.6 -0.89
1975 1814 140.9 — — — — -168 +119 -259 54.4% +0.01 9–3 (75%) 4–3 (57%) 106.1 -2.83 1983 1722 143.9 — — — — +55 -87 — 41.3% -0.43 4–7 (36%) 0–5 (0%) 91.3 -4.11
1976 1849 141.0 — — — — -235 +74 -173 54.5% +0.33 6–6 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 98.4 -2.94 1984 1704 128.6 — — — — -14 — -70 47.7% -0.47 5–5 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 100.9 -0.88
1977 1861 152.7 — — — — -166 +102 -183 52.5% +0.14 6–10 (38%) 4–7 (36%) 93.1 -7.43 1985 1678 113.9 — — — — -28 -65 -67 43.1% -0.61 5–3 (63%) 1–3 (25%) 100.7 +1.98
1978 1761 130.1 — — — — -89 +113 +14 52.9% +0.13 6–9 (40%) 6–4 (60%) 97.3 +1.25 1986 1619 111.1 — — — — +10 — -25 38.5% -0.67 2–4 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 95.5 +1.45
1979 1692 132.4 — — — — -98 +239 +54 45.5% -0.34 10–8 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 100.6 +2.72 1987 1595 117.3 — — — — +33 — — 35.7% -0.78 3–3 (50%) 0–1 — +0.12
1980 1681 127.8 — — — — -128 +207 +28 51.9% +0.19 5–7 (42%) 2–3 (40%) 97.4 +0.01 1988 1543 116.2 — — — — +33 -44 — 30.8% -1.31 4–4 (50%) 0–2 — -0.58
1981 1682 123.3 — — — — -26 +171 -14 51.2% +0.18 8–6 (57%) 2–3 (40%) 100.3 +0.42 1989 1593 121.4 — — — — +35 -117 — 31.4% -1.65 5–2 (71%) 4–2 (67%) 107.3 -2.73
1982 1693 123.3 — — — — -75 +88 -13 44.2% -0.42 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -1.67 1990 1612 125.3 — — — — +7 -86 — 43.9% -0.63 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.44
1983 1597 97.2 — — — — — +87 — 21.1% -2.40 0–2 1–0 — -0.02 1991 1630 119.5 — — — — +17 — — 41.4% -0.31 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.69
1984 1581 98.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.09 1992 1560 101.4 — — — — -16 — — 23.8% -2.00 0–3 (0%) 0–2 — -0.39
1985 1570 101.2 — — — — — +46 — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — +0.04 1993 1555 103.2 — — — — -21 — — 42.9% -0.71 0–1 1–0 — -0.16
1986 1533 90.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 1948 138.0 — — — — -122 +120 -54 50.6% +0.03 70–57 (55%) 31–33 (48%) 101.2 -0.68 Career 1938 136.6 — — — — +26 -129 -156 44.3% -0.42 47–56 (46%) 21–34 (38%) 92.7 -2.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.