H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Renata Tomanova vs Nancy Richey H2H: 1-0

Renata Tomanova holds a 1–0 lead over Nancy Richey in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Renata Tomanova leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Renata Tomanova won the 1977 Seattle round of 32 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Renata Tomanova
GER Age 71 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Nancy Richey
USA Age 84 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Renata Tomanova 6-3 6-1 Nancy Richey Match data Feb 3, 1977* R32 Seattle WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Renata Tomanova — — — 1,945 223 212 51.3% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Nancy Richey — #8 — 2,245 324 109 74.8% 1 0 0 2 19 22

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Renata Tomanova Nancy Richey
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1970 4–4 50.0% — 1,500 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1971 1–1 50.0% — 1,499 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1972 0–2 0.0% — 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1973 18–14 56.2% — 1,615 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1974 21–13 61.8% — 1,719 0 4 — — — — — — —
20 1975 23–16 59.0% — 1,813 0 6 — — — — — — —
21 1976 28–22 56.0% — 1,847 0 8 — — — — — — —
22 1977 28–26 51.9% — 1,858 0 9 — — — — — — —
23 1978 28–25 52.8% — 1,759 0 9 — — — — — — —
24 1979 21–26 44.7% — 1,691 0 9 — — — — — — —
25 1980 22–22 50.0% — 1,678 0 9 1968 56–5 91.8% — 1,916 1 4
26 1981 18–16 52.9% — 1,680 0 9 1969 33–8 80.5% — 2,054 1 7
27 1982 9–12 42.9% — 1,691 0 9 1970 43–8 84.3% — 2,122 1 14
28 1983 1–8 11.1% — 1,596 0 9 1971 29–13 69.0% — 2,076 1 14
29 1984 0–1 0.0% — 1,580 0 9 1972 45–12 78.9% — 2,194 1 19
30 1985 1–2 33.3% — 1,569 0 9 1973 34–13 72.3% — 2,191 1 19
31 1986 0–2 0.0% — 1,532 0 9 1974 25–13 65.8% — 2,151 1 19
32 — — — — — — — 1975 24–11 68.6% #8 2,120 1 20
33 — — — — — — — 1976 14–10 58.3% — 2,084 1 20
34 — — — — — — — 1977 15–7 68.2% — 2,016 1 22
35 — — — — — — — 1978 6–9 40.0% — 1,922 1 22

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Renata Tomanova Nancy Richey
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1970 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1971 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1972 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1973 — — — — 17 9 26 65.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1974 — — — — 19 8 27 70.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1975 2 2 4 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1976 2 1 3 66.7% 17 7 24 70.8% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1977 1 5 6 16.7% 17 7 24 70.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 7 10 17 41.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1978 4 4 8 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 13 7 20 65.0% 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1979 1 7 8 12.5% 9 6 15 60.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1980 5 6 11 45.5% 10 7 17 58.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1968 5 1 6 83.3% 35 3 38 92.1% 9 1 10 90.0% 4 0 4 100.0%
26 1981 5 4 9 55.6% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1969 15 4 19 78.9% 9 2 11 81.8% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — —
27 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1970 9 0 9 100.0% 26 5 31 83.9% 4 1 5 80.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
28 1983 0 1 1 0.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1971 8 4 12 66.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 2 8 75.0% 8 5 13 61.5%
29 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1972 11 1 12 91.7% 16 6 22 72.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 13 3 16 81.3%
30 1985 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1973 12 3 15 80.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3%
31 1986 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1974 12 7 19 63.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 11 3 14 78.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 4 12 66.7%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 4 4 8 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 7 4 11 63.6%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 9 4 13 69.2% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 5 6 11 45.5%
Career — 21 32 53 39.6% 130 86 216 60.2% 41 43 84 48.8% 20 46 66 30.3% — 87 29 116 75.0% 125 34 159 78.6% 38 11 49 77.6% 65 35 100 65.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Renata Tomanova Nancy Richey
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1970 1500 96.0 — — — — +67 -2 — 40.0% -0.50 4–0 (100%) — — +1.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1971 1499 98.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1972 1481 96.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1973 1615 134.4 — — — — -83 +113 — 52.1% +0.38 7–2 (78%) 1–2 (33%) 106.4 +2.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1974 1720 129.8 — — — — -209 +100 — 58.7% +0.75 7–2 (78%) 4–2 (67%) 107.8 +2.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1975 1814 140.9 — — — — -168 +118 -259 54.4% +0.01 9–3 (75%) 4–3 (57%) 106.1 -2.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1976 1847 140.8 — — — — -234 +75 -172 54.5% +0.33 6–6 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 98.4 -2.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1977 1859 152.5 — — — — -167 +104 -182 52.5% +0.14 6–10 (38%) 4–7 (36%) 93.1 -7.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1978 1759 129.4 — — — — -92 +115 +15 52.9% +0.13 6–9 (40%) 6–4 (60%) 97.2 +1.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1979 1692 132.3 — — — — -101 +238 +54 45.5% -0.34 10–8 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 100.6 +2.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1980 1679 128.6 — — — — -147 +207 +30 51.5% +0.20 4–7 (36%) 1–3 (25%) 95.3 -0.95 1968 1916 145.6 — — — — -119 +83 -174 87.6% +3.09 10–1 (91%) — — -0.10
26 1981 1680 123.2 — — — — -37 +172 -12 51.2% +0.18 8–6 (57%) 2–3 (40%) 100.4 +0.40 1969 2054 151.8 — — — — +32 -32 -127 77.3% +1.99 6–2 (75%) — — -3.41
27 1982 1692 123.3 — — — — -86 +88 -12 44.2% -0.42 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -1.63 1970 2123 162.9 — — — — +60 -35 -127 80.0% +2.51 6–2 (75%) 1–0 — -4.02
28 1983 1597 97.2 — — — — — +86 — 21.1% -2.40 0–2 1–0 — +0.01 1971 2077 156.0 — — — — +22 +31 -94 65.1% +1.50 4–4 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 97.6 -3.59
29 1984 1580 98.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.09 1972 2194 166.6 — — — — +186 -41 -224 79.6% +2.43 5–4 (56%) 4–3 (57%) 101.6 -6.67
30 1985 1569 101.2 — — — — — +46 — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — +0.04 1973 2192 164.0 — — — — +123 -6 -220 67.6% +1.24 9–7 (56%) 7–3 (70%) 101.3 -7.33
31 1986 1532 90.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.34 1974 2152 156.5 — — — — +112 +19 -165 68.9% +1.60 7–3 (70%) 3–3 (50%) 99.8 -3.90
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 2121 155.3 — — — — +105 -19 — 65.8% +1.55 8–4 (67%) 2–6 (25%) 96.2 -2.17
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 2085 155.1 — — — — +132 -40 — 60.0% +0.82 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 96.6 -4.18
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 2016 146.8 — — — — +91 +43 — 64.6% +1.42 3–3 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 96.9 -1.27
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1923 136.5 — — — — +56 +55 — 45.5% -0.24 0–3 (0%) 2–1 (67%) 95.2 -2.03
Career — 1946 138.0 — — — — -126 +121 -54 50.6% +0.03 69–57 (55%) 30–33 (48%) 100.5 -0.54 — 2245 164.5 — — — — +89 +9 -154 72.7% +1.89 62–37 (63%) 26–26 (50%) 100.3 -9.27

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.