H2H data updated: 2026-10-30 00:00 UTC

Renata Tomanova vs Valerie Ziegenfuss H2H: 1-0

Renata Tomanova holds a 1–0 lead over Valerie Ziegenfuss in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Renata Tomanova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Renata Tomanova won the 1978 Eastbourne Open round of 64 7-5 6-7 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Renata Tomanova
GER Age 71 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Valerie Ziegenfuss
USA Age 77

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Renata Tomanova 7-5 6-7 7-5 Valerie Ziegenfuss Match data Jun 21, 1978* R64 Eastbourne Open WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Renata Tomanova — — — 1,948 225 213 51.4% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Valerie Ziegenfuss — — — 1,954 233 233 50.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Renata Tomanova Valerie Ziegenfuss
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1970 4–4 50.0% — 1,500 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1971 1–1 50.0% — 1,499 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1972 0–2 0.0% — 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1973 18–14 56.2% — 1,615 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1974 21–13 61.8% — 1,719 0 4 1968 35–24 59.3% — 1,605 0 0
20 1975 23–16 59.0% — 1,813 0 6 1969 28–24 53.8% — 1,733 0 1
21 1976 28–22 56.0% — 1,848 0 8 1970 40–28 58.8% — 1,779 0 2
22 1977 28–26 51.9% — 1,860 0 9 1971 23–29 44.2% — 1,798 0 3
23 1978 28–25 52.8% — 1,761 0 9 1972 26–24 52.0% — 1,820 0 3
24 1979 21–26 44.7% — 1,692 0 9 1973 33–29 53.2% — 1,761 0 3
25 1980 24–23 51.1% — 1,680 0 9 1974 12–14 46.2% — 1,788 0 3
26 1981 18–16 52.9% — 1,681 0 9 1975 16–16 50.0% — 1,830 0 3
27 1982 9–12 42.9% — 1,692 0 9 1976 12–20 37.5% — 1,746 0 3
28 1983 1–8 11.1% — 1,597 0 9 1977 2–12 14.3% — 1,679 0 3
29 1984 0–1 0.0% — 1,580 0 9 1978 5–12 29.4% — 1,651 0 3
30 1985 1–2 33.3% — 1,569 0 9 1979 1–1 50.0% — 1,664 0 3
31 1986 0–2 0.0% — 1,533 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Renata Tomanova Valerie Ziegenfuss
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1970 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1971 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1972 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1973 — — — — 17 9 26 65.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1974 — — — — 19 8 27 70.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1968 5 4 9 55.6% 16 9 25 64.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1975 2 2 4 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1969 5 6 11 45.5% 12 8 20 60.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1976 2 1 3 66.7% 17 7 24 70.8% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 6 6 0.0% 1970 12 7 19 63.2% 13 8 21 61.9% 12 8 20 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
22 1977 1 5 6 16.7% 17 7 24 70.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 7 10 17 41.2% 1971 4 6 10 40.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 10 13 23.1%
23 1978 4 4 8 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 13 7 20 65.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 1972 6 4 10 60.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 9 16 43.8%
24 1979 1 7 8 12.5% 9 6 15 60.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 1973 5 6 11 45.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 12 12 24 50.0%
25 1980 5 6 11 45.5% 10 7 17 58.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 1974 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 9 8 17 52.9%
26 1981 5 4 9 55.6% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1975 8 6 14 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
27 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1976 3 3 6 50.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
28 1983 0 1 1 0.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
29 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1978 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
30 1985 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1979 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1986 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 21 32 53 39.6% 130 86 216 60.2% 41 43 84 48.8% 22 47 69 31.9% — 54 53 107 50.5% 76 64 140 54.3% 58 48 106 54.7% 42 65 107 39.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Renata Tomanova Valerie Ziegenfuss
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1970 1500 96.0 — — — — +67 -2 — 40.0% -0.50 4–0 (100%) — — +1.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1971 1499 98.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1972 1481 96.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1973 1615 134.4 — — — — -83 +113 — 52.1% +0.38 7–2 (78%) 1–2 (33%) 106.4 +2.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1974 1720 129.8 — — — — -209 +100 — 58.7% +0.75 7–2 (78%) 4–2 (67%) 107.8 +1.96 1968 1605 119.1 — — — — -45 +58 +13 57.4% +0.80 9–4 (69%) — — -0.64
20 1975 1814 140.9 — — — — -168 +119 -259 54.4% +0.01 9–3 (75%) 4–3 (57%) 106.1 -2.83 1969 1734 126.4 — — — — -175 -30 +9 51.4% +0.32 6–3 (67%) — — -2.24
21 1976 1849 141.0 — — — — -235 +74 -173 54.5% +0.33 6–6 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 98.4 -2.94 1970 1780 133.1 — — — — -34 -31 +26 55.6% +0.45 11–4 (73%) 0–1 — -2.50
22 1977 1861 152.7 — — — — -166 +102 -183 52.5% +0.14 6–10 (38%) 4–7 (36%) 93.1 -7.43 1971 1799 143.5 — — — — -114 +2 0 46.0% -0.35 5–8 (38%) 3–2 (60%) 99.7 -6.44
23 1978 1761 130.1 — — — — -89 +113 +14 52.9% +0.13 6–9 (40%) 6–4 (60%) 97.3 +1.25 1972 1821 139.7 — — — — -47 -20 -41 48.2% +0.09 9–3 (75%) 4–4 (50%) 105.3 -5.04
24 1979 1692 132.4 — — — — -98 +239 +54 45.5% -0.34 10–8 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 100.6 +2.72 1973 1761 143.5 — — — — -2 +54 +48 54.3% +0.18 7–9 (44%) 4–5 (44%) 95.0 -5.52
25 1980 1681 127.8 — — — — -128 +207 +28 51.9% +0.19 5–7 (42%) 2–3 (40%) 97.4 +0.01 1974 1789 134.2 — — — — +8 — — 46.6% -0.29 3–3 (50%) 0–3 (0%) 97.0 -2.42
26 1981 1682 123.3 — — — — -26 +171 -14 51.2% +0.18 8–6 (57%) 2–3 (40%) 100.3 +0.42 1975 1830 135.8 — — — — +53 -29 — 49.3% -0.35 6–5 (55%) 2–2 (50%) 99.8 -1.06
27 1982 1693 123.3 — — — — -75 +88 -13 44.2% -0.42 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -1.67 1976 1747 126.7 — — — — +33 -52 +32 41.1% -0.78 3–6 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 97.4 -2.67
28 1983 1597 97.2 — — — — — +87 — 21.1% -2.40 0–2 1–0 — -0.02 1977 1679 124.6 — — — — +10 -23 — 16.7% -2.17 1–1 1–3 (25%) — -1.96
29 1984 1581 98.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.09 1978 1652 127.4 — — — — -20 +24 — 36.6% -1.17 2–5 (29%) 5–1 (83%) 99.1 -1.13
30 1985 1570 101.2 — — — — — +46 — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — +0.04 1979 1664 111.0 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — -0.14
31 1986 1533 90.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1948 138.0 — — — — -122 +120 -54 50.6% +0.03 70–57 (55%) 31–33 (48%) 101.2 -0.68 — 1954 139.0 — — — — -28 -1 +15 49.4% -0.01 63–51 (55%) 22–24 (48%) 101.7 -6.89

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.