H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Renata Tomanova vs Zenda Liess H2H: 3-1

Renata Tomanova holds a 3–1 lead over Zenda Liess in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Renata Tomanova leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Zenda Liess won the 1978 Stuart quarterfinal 6-2 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Renata Tomanova
GER Age 71 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main-draw meetings
Zenda Liess
USA Age 66

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Zenda Liess 6-2 7-6 Renata Tomanova Match data Apr 3, 1978* QF Stuart WTA 250 Clay
Renata Tomanova 5-7 7-5 6-3 Zenda Liess Match data Mar 29, 1978* R32 Philadelphia WTA 250 Hard
Renata Tomanova 6-4 7-5 Zenda Liess Match data Feb 23, 1978* R32 Detroit WTA 250 Carpet
Renata Tomanova 7-5 7-5 Zenda Liess Match data Mar 16, 1974* QF Ocala WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Renata Tomanova — — — 1,945 223 212 51.3% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Zenda Liess — — — 1,743 42 61 40.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Renata Tomanova Zenda Liess
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1974 7–7 50.0% — 1,554 0 0
15 1970 4–4 50.0% — 1,500 0 0 1975 4–5 44.4% — 1,573 0 0
16 1971 1–1 50.0% — 1,499 0 0 1976 7–4 63.6% — 1,668 0 0
17 1972 0–2 0.0% — 1,480 0 0 1977 4–13 23.5% — 1,619 0 0
18 1973 18–14 56.2% — 1,615 0 0 1978 16–17 48.5% — 1,742 0 0
19 1974 21–13 61.8% — 1,719 0 4 1979 3–11 21.4% — 1,662 0 0
20 1975 23–16 59.0% — 1,813 0 6 1980 1–4 20.0% — 1,610 0 0
21 1976 28–22 56.0% — 1,847 0 8 — — — — — — —
22 1977 28–26 51.9% — 1,858 0 9 — — — — — — —
23 1978 28–25 52.8% — 1,759 0 9 — — — — — — —
24 1979 21–26 44.7% — 1,691 0 9 — — — — — — —
25 1980 22–22 50.0% — 1,678 0 9 — — — — — — —
26 1981 18–16 52.9% — 1,680 0 9 — — — — — — —
27 1982 9–12 42.9% — 1,691 0 9 — — — — — — —
28 1983 1–8 11.1% — 1,596 0 9 — — — — — — —
29 1984 0–1 0.0% — 1,580 0 9 — — — — — — —
30 1985 1–2 33.3% — 1,569 0 9 — — — — — — —
31 1986 0–2 0.0% — 1,532 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Renata Tomanova Zenda Liess
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
15 1970 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1975 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
16 1971 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
17 1972 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 6 6 0.0%
18 1973 — — — — 17 9 26 65.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1978 6 8 14 42.9% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 4 6 10 40.0%
19 1974 — — — — 19 8 27 70.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1979 2 6 8 25.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — —
20 1975 2 2 4 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1980 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1976 2 1 3 66.7% 17 7 24 70.8% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1977 1 5 6 16.7% 17 7 24 70.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 7 10 17 41.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1978 4 4 8 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 13 7 20 65.0% 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1979 1 7 8 12.5% 9 6 15 60.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1980 5 6 11 45.5% 10 7 17 58.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1981 5 4 9 55.6% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1983 0 1 1 0.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1985 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1986 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 21 32 53 39.6% 130 86 216 60.2% 41 43 84 48.8% 20 46 66 30.3% — 9 19 28 32.1% 23 24 47 48.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 13 18 27.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Renata Tomanova Zenda Liess
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1554 119.5 — — — — — -29 — 50.0% +0.32 2–0 1–3 (25%) — +0.30
15 1970 1500 96.0 — — — — +67 -2 — 40.0% -0.50 4–0 (100%) — — +1.89 1975 1574 114.9 — — — — — +15 — 47.8% -0.09 2–3 (40%) 0–2 — -0.13
16 1971 1499 98.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.64 1976 1669 124.1 — — — — — +28 — 59.1% +1.09 1–1 — — +0.18
17 1972 1481 96.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — -0.01 1977 1619 124.4 — — — — -92 +63 — 30.6% -1.64 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.9 -0.82
18 1973 1615 134.4 — — — — -83 +113 — 52.1% +0.38 7–2 (78%) 1–2 (33%) 106.4 +2.79 1978 1743 135.7 — — — — -78 -37 — 50.0% -0.22 4–6 (40%) 6–2 (75%) 101.0 -0.24
19 1974 1720 129.8 — — — — -209 +100 — 58.7% +0.75 7–2 (78%) 4–2 (67%) 107.8 +2.40 1979 1662 120.1 — — — — -29 -5 — 28.1% -1.97 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — -0.45
20 1975 1814 140.9 — — — — -168 +118 -259 54.4% +0.01 9–3 (75%) 4–3 (57%) 106.1 -2.52 1980 1610 95.3 — — — — -77 — — 27.3% -1.91 0–1 1–0 — -0.03
21 1976 1847 140.8 — — — — -234 +75 -172 54.5% +0.33 6–6 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 98.4 -2.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1977 1859 152.5 — — — — -167 +104 -182 52.5% +0.14 6–10 (38%) 4–7 (36%) 93.1 -7.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1978 1759 129.4 — — — — -92 +115 +15 52.9% +0.13 6–9 (40%) 6–4 (60%) 97.2 +1.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1979 1692 132.3 — — — — -101 +238 +54 45.5% -0.34 10–8 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 100.6 +2.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1980 1679 128.6 — — — — -147 +207 +30 51.5% +0.20 4–7 (36%) 1–3 (25%) 95.3 -0.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1981 1680 123.2 — — — — -37 +172 -12 51.2% +0.18 8–6 (57%) 2–3 (40%) 100.4 +0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1982 1692 123.3 — — — — -86 +88 -12 44.2% -0.42 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -1.63 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1983 1597 97.2 — — — — — +86 — 21.1% -2.40 0–2 1–0 — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1984 1580 98.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1985 1569 101.2 — — — — — +46 — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1986 1532 90.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1946 138.0 — — — — -126 +121 -54 50.6% +0.03 69–57 (55%) 30–33 (48%) 100.5 -0.54 — 1744 131.4 — — — — -71 +6 — 43.4% -0.57 11–17 (39%) 10–9 (53%) 98.1 -1.17

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.