H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Rene Blount vs Mima Jausovec H2H: 0-4
Mima Jausovec holds a 4–0 lead over Rene Blount in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mima Jausovec leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mima Jausovec won the 1981 Sydney second round 7-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Right-Handed
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
SLO
Age 69
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 1981* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R64 | Grass | Mima Jausovec | 7-6 6-2 | Rene Blount | Match data |
| Jun 28, 1981* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Mima Jausovec | 6-2 7-5 | Rene Blount | Match data |
| Aug 8, 1979* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Mima Jausovec | 6-1 6-2 | Rene Blount | Match data |
| Oct 27, 1978* | Filderstadt | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Mima Jausovec | 6-3 6-3 | Rene Blount | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rene Blount | #180 | #153 | 3 | 1,621 | 31 | 84 | 27.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mima Jausovec | #400 | #23 | 2 | 2,088 | 339 | 246 | 57.9% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Rene Blount | Mima Jausovec | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1975 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 2–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 1 |
| 1978 | 7–11 | 38.9% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 1 |
| 1979 | 4–18 | 18.2% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 18–13 | 58.1% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 1 |
| 1980 | 6–14 | 30.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 16–19 | 45.7% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 1 |
| 1981 | 9–18 | 33.3% | — | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 33–16 | 67.3% | — | 1,996 | 0 | 4 |
| 1982 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 2,008 | 1 | 5 |
| 1983 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,922 | 1 | 6 |
| 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 32–28 | 53.3% | — | 1,866 | 1 | 6 |
| 1985 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 34–22 | 60.7% | — | 1,941 | 1 | 6 |
| 1986 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #153 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 57–28 | 67.1% | — | 2,010 | 1 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 36–24 | 60.0% | — | 1,861 | 1 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,873 | 1 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #87 | 1,747 | 1 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,695 | 1 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #184 | 1,673 | 1 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #233 | 1,656 | 1 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #362 | 1,641 | 1 | 7 |