H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Rene Simpson vs Bettina Fulco H2H: 2-0
Rene Simpson holds a 2–0 lead over Bettina Fulco in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Rene Simpson leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Rene Simpson won the 1992 Berlin second round 4-6 6-1 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 57
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 1992* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Rene Simpson | 4-6 6-1 7-6 | Bettina Fulco | Match data |
| May 1, 1991* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Rene Simpson | 2-6 6-0 6-2 | Bettina Fulco | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rene Simpson | #546 | #70 | 256 | 1,663 | 44 | 83 | 34.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bettina Fulco | #770 | #23 | 197 | 1,873 | 139 | 152 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rene Simpson | Bettina Fulco | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #116 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #40 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #24 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #47 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #131 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #132 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #76 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #109 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #83 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #180 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #290 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #132 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #88 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1992 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #104 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #142 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1993 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #122 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #133 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1994 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #154 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #247 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1996 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #148 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1997 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #109 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #548 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |