H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Rene Simpson vs Kimberly Po Messerli H2H: 0-1
Kimberly Po Messerli holds a 1–0 lead over Rene Simpson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kimberly Po Messerli leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kimberly Po Messerli won the 1992 Wimbledon first round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 54
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 1992* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Kimberly Po Messerli | 6-4 6-3 | Rene Simpson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rene Simpson | #546 | #70 | 256 | 1,663 | 44 | 83 | 34.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimberly Po Messerli | — | — | — | 1,878 | 118 | 133 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rene Simpson | Kimberly Po Messerli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 14–16 | 46.7% | — | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 20–19 | 51.3% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #132 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 11–17 | 39.3% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #109 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 4–13 | 23.5% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #180 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 20–13 | 60.6% | — | 1,806 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #132 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 27–20 | 57.4% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1992 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #104 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,742 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1993 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #122 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1994 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #154 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #189 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1996 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #148 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1997 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #109 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #548 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |