H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Rika Hiraki vs Christina Singer H2H: 1-1
Rika Hiraki and Christina Singer are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Rika Hiraki leads 1–0 on grass, while Christina Singer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rika Hiraki won the 1996 Wimbledon first round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 54
Right-Handed
157 cm / 5'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 57
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 1996* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Rika Hiraki | 7-5 6-4 | Christina Singer | Match data |
| Aug 3, 1993* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Christina Singer | 6-4 7-6 | Rika Hiraki | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rika Hiraki | #965 | #72 | 325 | 1,589 | 48 | 93 | 34.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Christina Singer | #892 | #41 | 163 | 1,738 | 56 | 86 | 39.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rika Hiraki | Christina Singer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1988 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #305 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #85 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #105 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #160 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #122 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #264 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #134 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1994 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #187 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #152 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1996 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #80 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1997 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #93 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #77 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1998 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #168 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #54 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #136 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #504 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |