H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Rika Hiraki vs Donna Faber H2H: 1-0
Rika Hiraki holds a 1–0 lead over Donna Faber in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rika Hiraki leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rika Hiraki won the 1992 Tokyo Nichirei third round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 54
Right-Handed
157 cm / 5'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 1992* | Tokyo Nichirei | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Rika Hiraki | 6-4 6-1 | Donna Faber | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rika Hiraki | #965 | #72 | 325 | 1,589 | 48 | 93 | 34.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Donna Faber | #227 | #55 | 19 | 1,718 | 68 | 97 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rika Hiraki | Donna Faber | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #218 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1988 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #305 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #131 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #84 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #105 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #99 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #122 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #116 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #134 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #227 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #187 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1995 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #152 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1996 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1997 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #93 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1998 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #168 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |