H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Rika Hiraki vs Karin Kschwendt H2H: 1-1
Rika Hiraki and Karin Kschwendt are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Rika Hiraki leads 1–0 on grass, while Karin Kschwendt leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Karin Kschwendt won the 1993 Taipei fourth round 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 54
Right-Handed
157 cm / 5'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 57
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 1993* | Taipei | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Karin Kschwendt | 6-4 6-0 | Rika Hiraki | Match data |
| Jun 24, 1992* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Rika Hiraki | 6-0 6-3 | Karin Kschwendt | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rika Hiraki | #965 | #72 | 325 | 1,589 | 48 | 93 | 34.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Karin Kschwendt | #507 | #37 | 426 | 1,712 | 79 | 116 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rika Hiraki | Karin Kschwendt | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1988 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #305 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1991 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #105 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1992 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #122 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #178 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #134 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #116 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #187 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #88 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #152 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #77 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1996 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #81 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1997 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #93 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #99 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1998 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #168 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #85 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #53 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #172 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #139 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #413 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |