H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Rika Hiraki vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 0-4

Kimiko Date Krumm holds a 4–0 lead over Rika Hiraki in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Kimiko Date Krumm leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Kimiko Date Krumm won the 1996 Tokyo third round 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rika Hiraki
JPN Age 54 Right-Handed 157 cm / 5'2"
H2H
0 – 4
4 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date Krumm
Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 18, 1996* Tokyo WTA 500 R32 Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 6-3 6-1 Rika Hiraki #90 Match data
Aug 31, 1994* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 6-0 6-2 Rika Hiraki #152 Match data
Jun 16, 1993* Eastbourne WTA 250 R64 Grass Kimiko Date Krumm 6-3 6-4 Rika Hiraki #99 Match data
Feb 12, 1993* Osaka WTA 250 R32 Carpet Kimiko Date Krumm 6-2 6-2 Rika Hiraki #86 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Rika Hiraki #965 #72 325 1,589 48 93 34.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kimiko Date Krumm — — — 2,091 241 188 56.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rika Hiraki Kimiko Date Krumm
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1988 0–2 0.0% #305 1,477 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1990 0–2 0.0% #248 1,451 0 0 1989 6–5 54.5% — 1,562 0 0
19 1991 8–8 50.0% #105 1,544 0 0 1990 10–7 58.8% — 1,664 0 0
20 1992 8–15 34.8% #122 1,570 0 0 1991 12–11 52.2% — 1,725 0 0
21 1993 8–18 30.8% #134 1,550 0 0 1992 26–13 66.7% — 1,867 0 1
22 1994 2–8 20.0% #187 1,504 0 0 1993 25–11 69.4% — 1,956 0 2
23 1995 4–7 36.4% #152 1,525 0 0 1994 32–12 72.7% — 1,987 0 4
24 1996 6–12 33.3% #103 1,511 0 0 1995 39–12 76.5% — 2,029 0 5
25 1997 9–16 36.0% #93 1,486 0 0 1996 31–13 70.5% — 2,071 0 7
26 1998 3–4 42.9% #168 1,502 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2001 0–1 0.0% #339 1,498 0 0 — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% — 2,042 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2009 6–11 35.3% — 1,841 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2010 19–18 51.4% — 1,814 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2011 7–24 22.6% — 1,567 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2012 2–14 12.5% — 1,454 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% — 1,575 0 8
43 — — — — — — — 2014 11–14 44.0% — 1,597 0 8
44 — — — — — — — 2015 3–6 33.3% — 1,574 0 8
46 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% — 1,564 0 8