H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Rika Hiraki vs Marianne Werdel Witmeyer H2H: 1-0
Rika Hiraki holds a 1–0 lead over Marianne Werdel Witmeyer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rika Hiraki leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rika Hiraki won the 1996 Jakarta fourth round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 54
Right-Handed
157 cm / 5'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 1996* | Jakarta | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Rika Hiraki | 6-4 6-3 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rika Hiraki | #965 | #72 | 325 | 1,589 | 48 | 93 | 34.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,849 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Rika Hiraki | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1988 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #305 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #105 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #122 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #134 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 1994 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #187 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #152 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #93 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #168 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |