H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Rika Hiraki vs Nana Smith H2H: 0-2
Nana Smith holds a 2–0 lead over Rika Hiraki in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nana Smith leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nana Smith won the 1997 Jakarta fourth round 6-4 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 54
Right-Handed
157 cm / 5'2"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 55
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 1997* | Jakarta | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Nana Smith | 6-4 3-6 6-2 | Rika Hiraki | Match data |
| Feb 2, 1990* | Tokyo Pan Pacific | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Nana Smith | 7-6 6-2 | Rika Hiraki | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rika Hiraki | #965 | #72 | 325 | 1,589 | 48 | 93 | 34.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nana Smith | #669 | #51 | 332 | 1,649 | 65 | 114 | 36.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rika Hiraki | Nana Smith | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1988 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #305 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #103 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #105 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #113 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1992 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #122 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #144 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1993 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #134 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1994 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #187 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #317 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1995 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #152 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #58 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1996 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #128 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1997 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #93 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1998 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #168 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #105 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #134 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |