H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Rika Hiraki vs Noelle Van Lottum H2H: 0-2
Noelle Van Lottum holds a 2–0 lead over Rika Hiraki in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Noelle Van Lottum leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Noelle Van Lottum won the 1993 Brisbane second round 6-4 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 54
Right-Handed
157 cm / 5'2"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
Age 54
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 1993* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Noelle Van Lottum | 6-4 7-6 | Rika Hiraki | Match data |
| Mar 14, 1992* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Noelle Van Lottum | 6-0 7-5 | Rika Hiraki | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rika Hiraki | #965 | #72 | 325 | 1,589 | 48 | 93 | 34.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Noelle Van Lottum | — | — | — | 1,659 | 56 | 96 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rika Hiraki | Noelle Van Lottum | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1988 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #305 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1991 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #105 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 17–20 | 45.9% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1992 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #122 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 13–21 | 38.2% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1993 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #134 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1994 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #187 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–9 | 10.0% | — | 1,466 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1995 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #152 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,442 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1996 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,427 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1997 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #93 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,429 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1998 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #168 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,416 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |