H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Rita Bentley vs Susan Vinton H2H: 0-1
Susan Vinton holds a 1–0 lead over Rita Bentley in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Susan Vinton leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Susan Vinton won the 1972 Manchester second round 4-6 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 1972* | Manchester | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Susan Vinton | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | Rita Bentley | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rita Bentley | — | — | — | 1,578 | 16 | 30 | 34.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Susan Vinton | — | — | — | 1,525 | 10 | 31 | 24.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rita Bentley | Susan Vinton | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 2–8 | 20.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,415 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,402 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | 1968 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1969 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1970 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 1971 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 1972 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 41 | 1973 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 42 | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 48 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 49 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,447 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |