H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Rita Grande vs Anna Kournikova H2H: 1-1
Rita Grande and Anna Kournikova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anna Kournikova leads 1–0 on clay, while Rita Grande leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Rita Grande won the 2002 Eastbourne third round 6-7(4) 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 51
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2002* | Eastbourne | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Rita Grande | 6-7(4) 6-3 6-1 | Anna Kournikova | Match data |
| May 5, 1999* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Anna Kournikova | 6-7 6-3 2-0 (ret.) | Rita Grande | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rita Grande | #1,172 | #24 | 1,020 | 1,755 | 172 | 218 | 44.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Anna Kournikova | #606 | #8 | 2,158 | 2,072 | 184 | 120 | 60.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rita Grande | Anna Kournikova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #289 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #65 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #370 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #30 | 1,838 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,971 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #12 | 1,933 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #146 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 47–26 | 64.4% | #9 | 1,940 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #72 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #71 | 1,816 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #71 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #35 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #44 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #310 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #59 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1999 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2000 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2001 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #24 | 1,742 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2002 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #46 | 1,641 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2003 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #70 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2004 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1088 | 1,518 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |