H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Rita Grande vs Ansley Cargill H2H: 1-0

Rita Grande holds a 1–0 lead over Ansley Cargill in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rita Grande leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Rita Grande won the 2003 Roland Garros round of 128 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rita Grande
ITA Age 51 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Ansley Cargill
USA Age 44 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Rita Grande #56 6-3 6-1 Ansley Cargill #91 Match data May 28, 2003* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rita Grande #1,172 #24 1,020 1,755 173 220 44.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Ansley Cargill #389 #90 400 1,564 6 18 25.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rita Grande Ansley Cargill
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1991 0–2 0.0% #370 1,471 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1993 0–1 0.0% #186 1,456 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #268 1,484 0 0
19 1994 7–12 36.8% #146 1,491 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #232 1,476 0 0
20 1995 10–11 47.6% #72 1,591 0 0 2002 2–4 33.3% #122 1,484 0 0
21 1996 10–16 38.5% #71 1,617 0 0 2003 4–9 30.8% #110 1,475 0 0
22 1997 15–18 45.5% #44 1,667 0 0 2004 0–2 0.0% #241 1,463 0 0
23 1998 12–23 34.3% #59 1,581 0 0 2005 0–1 0.0% #301 1,453 0 0
24 1999 21–18 53.8% #54 1,677 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2000 16–22 42.1% #77 1,608 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2001 35–26 57.4% #24 1,742 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 2002 21–27 43.8% #46 1,640 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 2003 14–25 35.9% #70 1,534 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 2004 12–18 40.0% #104 1,536 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 2005 0–1 0.0% #1088 1,518 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rita Grande Ansley Cargill
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1991 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1993 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1994 7 9 16 43.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1995 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1996 8 9 17 47.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1997 12 11 23 52.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2004 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1998 4 10 14 28.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1999 15 9 24 62.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2000 6 10 16 37.5% 6 9 15 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2001 28 16 44 63.6% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2002 12 15 27 44.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2003 3 13 16 18.8% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2004 5 10 15 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 110 122 232 47.4% 37 56 93 39.8% 15 24 39 38.5% 11 18 29 37.9% — 3 12 15 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rita Grande Ansley Cargill
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1991 1471 91.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1993 1456 94.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.13 2000 1484 99.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.20
19 1994 1492 108.7 — — — — +66 — — 40.0% -0.67 3–4 (43%) 0–4 (0%) 95.5 +0.41 2001 1477 104.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.06
20 1995 1591 131.2 — — — — +49 — — 47.1% +0.26 5–4 (56%) 1–4 (20%) 100.8 +0.32 2002 1485 113.6 — — — — +22 — — 40.0% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 3–0 (100%) 101.9 -0.18
21 1996 1618 126.5 — — — — +22 -164 -67 42.4% -0.41 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) 94.9 +0.05 2003 1475 100.9 -3.24 -2.26 0.507 35.7% +2 +72 — 27.6% -1.93 3–0 (100%) 1–0 — -0.51
22 1997 1668 136.7 — — — — +21 -161 — 48.7% -0.33 4–10 (29%) 4–1 (80%) 97.9 +0.01 2004 1463 107.6 +1.85 -2.17 0.535 42.3% — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 — — -0.12
23 1998 1581 124.9 — — — — +29 -89 -16 37.0% -1.12 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 103.0 -0.29 2005 1454 98.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.07
24 1999 1678 125.6 — — — — +23 -179 -105 50.0% -0.45 10–2 (83%) 5–2 (71%) 110.9 -0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2000 1608 123.5 — — — — +28 -76 -44 43.9% -0.27 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 101.6 -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2001 1742 138.0 — — — — +31 -163 -198 54.7% +0.35 11–8 (58%) 6–7 (46%) 101.8 +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2002 1641 120.5 — — — — -19 -46 -67 44.1% -0.36 8–7 (53%) 4–7 (36%) 100.1 +1.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2003 1534 112.1 +0.28 +0.94 1.123 52.5% -41 +90 +57 40.7% -0.78 6–9 (40%) 1–3 (25%) 97.2 +1.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2004 1536 104.3 -0.87 -1.71 0.916 47.8% -71 +57 +70 44.6% -0.70 5–9 (36%) 6–3 (67%) 100.9 +1.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 1518 99.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1755 128.5 -0.35 -0.51 1.007 50.0% +13 -66 -49 45.2% -0.40 63–69 (48%) 38–41 (48%) 101.0 +1.12 — 1564 108.0 -1.97 -2.24 0.512 37.4% +13 +72 — 27.3% -1.67 4–3 (57%) 4–2 (67%) 104.9 -3.08

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.