H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Rita Grande vs Bianka Lamade H2H: 1-0

Rita Grande holds a 1–0 lead over Bianka Lamade in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rita Grande leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rita Grande won the 2001 Bratislava quarterfinal 5-7 6-4 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rita Grande
ITA Age 51 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Bianka Lamade
GER Age 44 Right-Handed 184 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Rita Grande #38 5-7 6-4 7-6(5) Bianka Lamade #74 Match data Oct 20, 2001* QF Bratislava Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rita Grande #1,172 #24 1,020 1,755 173 220 44.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Bianka Lamade #1,261 #59 538 1,668 21 28 42.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rita Grande Bianka Lamade
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1991 0–2 0.0% #370 1,471 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — 2000 3–2 60.0% #126 1,542 0 0
18 1993 0–1 0.0% #186 1,456 0 0 2001 14–12 53.8% #67 1,627 0 1
19 1994 7–12 36.8% #146 1,491 0 0 2002 4–13 23.5% #223 1,537 0 1
20 1995 10–11 47.6% #72 1,591 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #178 1,527 0 1
21 1996 10–16 38.5% #71 1,617 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1997 15–18 45.5% #44 1,667 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1998 12–23 34.3% #59 1,581 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1999 21–18 53.8% #54 1,677 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2000 16–22 42.1% #77 1,608 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2001 35–26 57.4% #24 1,742 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 2002 21–27 43.8% #46 1,640 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 2003 14–25 35.9% #70 1,534 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 2004 12–18 40.0% #104 1,536 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 2005 0–1 0.0% #1088 1,518 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rita Grande Bianka Lamade
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1991 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1993 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2001 7 3 10 70.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
19 1994 7 9 16 43.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2002 2 5 7 28.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
20 1995 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1996 8 9 17 47.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1997 12 11 23 52.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1998 4 10 14 28.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1999 15 9 24 62.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2000 6 10 16 37.5% 6 9 15 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2001 28 16 44 63.6% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2002 12 15 27 44.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2003 3 13 16 18.8% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2004 5 10 15 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 110 122 232 47.4% 37 56 93 39.8% 15 24 39 38.5% 11 18 29 37.9% — 9 9 18 50.0% 10 16 26 38.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rita Grande Bianka Lamade
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1991 1471 91.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1542 112.0 — — — — — +40 — 58.3% +0.17 1–1 — — +0.15
18 1993 1456 94.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.13 2001 1628 123.2 — — — — -38 +12 — 49.1% -0.16 5–4 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 102.9 +0.29
19 1994 1492 108.7 — — — — +66 — — 40.0% -0.67 3–4 (43%) 0–4 (0%) 95.5 +0.41 2002 1537 104.6 — — — — +28 +5 +27 28.2% -1.56 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — -0.54
20 1995 1591 131.2 — — — — +49 — — 47.1% +0.26 5–4 (56%) 1–4 (20%) 100.8 +0.32 2003 1527 98.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — -0.14
21 1996 1618 126.5 — — — — +22 -164 -67 42.4% -0.41 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) 94.9 +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1997 1668 136.7 — — — — +21 -161 — 48.7% -0.33 4–10 (29%) 4–1 (80%) 97.9 +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1998 1581 124.9 — — — — +29 -89 -16 37.0% -1.12 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 103.0 -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1999 1678 125.6 — — — — +23 -179 -105 50.0% -0.45 10–2 (83%) 5–2 (71%) 110.9 -0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2000 1608 123.5 — — — — +28 -76 -44 43.9% -0.27 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 101.6 -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2001 1742 138.0 — — — — +31 -163 -198 54.7% +0.35 11–8 (58%) 6–7 (46%) 101.8 +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2002 1641 120.5 — — — — -19 -46 -67 44.1% -0.36 8–7 (53%) 4–7 (36%) 100.1 +1.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2003 1534 112.1 +0.28 +0.94 1.123 52.5% -41 +90 +57 40.7% -0.78 6–9 (40%) 1–3 (25%) 97.2 +1.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2004 1536 104.3 -0.87 -1.71 0.916 47.8% -71 +57 +70 44.6% -0.70 5–9 (36%) 6–3 (67%) 100.9 +1.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 1518 99.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1755 128.5 -0.35 -0.51 1.007 50.0% +13 -66 -49 45.2% -0.40 63–69 (48%) 38–41 (48%) 101.0 +1.12 — 1669 116.2 — — — — -11 +16 +27 41.8% -0.67 8–8 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 100.9 -0.49

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.