H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Rita Grande vs Els Callens H2H: 2-1

Rita Grande holds a 2–1 lead over Els Callens in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Rita Grande leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Els Callens leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Rita Grande won the 2004 Vancouver round of 32 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rita Grande
ITA Age 51 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Els Callens
BEL Age 56 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Rita Grande #98 6-4 6-4 Els Callens #107 Match data Aug 12, 2004* R32 Vancouver Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Els Callens #44 4-6 6-1 6-3 Rita Grande #89 Match data Feb 13, 1997* R32 Linz Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet
Rita Grande #67 7-5 6-1 Els Callens #118 Match data Sep 1, 1996* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rita Grande #1,172 #24 1,020 1,755 173 220 44.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Els Callens #473 #43 582 1,715 83 128 39.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rita Grande Els Callens
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1991 0–2 0.0% #370 1,471 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1993 0–1 0.0% #186 1,456 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1994 7–12 36.8% #146 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1995 10–11 47.6% #72 1,591 0 0 1991 1–1 50.0% #168 1,509 0 0
21 1996 10–16 38.5% #71 1,617 0 0 1992 0–1 0.0% #231 1,492 0 0
22 1997 15–18 45.5% #44 1,667 0 0 1993 2–1 66.7% #188 1,513 0 0
23 1998 12–23 34.3% #59 1,581 0 0 1994 4–3 57.1% #110 1,560 0 0
24 1999 21–18 53.8% #54 1,677 0 0 1995 8–11 42.1% #95 1,551 0 0
25 2000 16–22 42.1% #77 1,608 0 0 1996 13–12 52.0% #51 1,692 0 0
26 2001 35–26 57.4% #24 1,742 0 2 1997 8–16 33.3% #98 1,579 0 0
27 2002 21–27 43.8% #46 1,640 0 2 1998 2–8 20.0% #102 1,525 0 0
28 2003 14–25 35.9% #70 1,534 0 3 1999 7–9 43.8% #82 1,569 0 0
29 2004 12–18 40.0% #104 1,536 0 3 2000 8–13 38.1% #100 1,564 0 0
30 2005 0–1 0.0% #1088 1,518 0 3 2001 2–6 25.0% #177 1,522 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2002 9–10 47.4% #67 1,606 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2003 13–19 40.6% #73 1,637 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2004 5–15 25.0% #122 1,539 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2005 1–3 25.0% #224 1,521 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rita Grande Els Callens
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1991 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1993 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1994 7 9 16 43.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1995 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 1996 8 9 17 47.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1997 12 11 23 52.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1993 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
23 1998 4 10 14 28.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1994 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
24 1999 15 9 24 62.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1995 1 4 5 20.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
25 2000 6 10 16 37.5% 6 9 15 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 1996 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
26 2001 28 16 44 63.6% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1997 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
27 2002 12 15 27 44.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1998 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 2003 3 13 16 18.8% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
29 2004 5 10 15 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 5 6 11 45.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 4 7 11 36.4% 1 6 7 14.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 3 9 12 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 110 122 232 47.4% 37 56 93 39.8% 15 24 39 38.5% 11 18 29 37.9% — 26 49 75 34.7% 15 29 44 34.1% 19 23 42 45.2% 23 27 50 46.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rita Grande Els Callens
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1991 1471 91.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1993 1456 94.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1994 1492 108.7 — — — — +66 — — 40.0% -0.67 3–4 (43%) 0–4 (0%) 95.5 +0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1995 1591 131.2 — — — — +49 — — 47.1% +0.26 5–4 (56%) 1–4 (20%) 100.8 +0.32 1991 1509 97.7 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 1–1 — +0.24
21 1996 1618 126.5 — — — — +22 -164 -67 42.4% -0.41 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) 94.9 +0.05 1992 1493 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.06
22 1997 1668 136.7 — — — — +21 -161 — 48.7% -0.33 4–10 (29%) 4–1 (80%) 97.9 +0.01 1993 1514 102.8 — — — — +47 — — 57.1% +0.14 1–0 — — +0.46
23 1998 1581 124.9 — — — — +29 -89 -16 37.0% -1.12 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 103.0 -0.29 1994 1561 113.2 — — — — +25 — — 56.3% +0.63 1–1 1–0 — -0.16
24 1999 1678 125.6 — — — — +23 -179 -105 50.0% -0.45 10–2 (83%) 5–2 (71%) 110.9 -0.74 1995 1551 116.0 — — — — -68 +43 +105 45.2% -0.24 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.58
25 2000 1608 123.5 — — — — +28 -76 -44 43.9% -0.27 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 101.6 -0.24 1996 1692 128.2 — — — — -52 -110 +3 48.1% -0.30 4–2 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 103.8 +0.50
26 2001 1742 138.0 — — — — +31 -163 -198 54.7% +0.35 11–8 (58%) 6–7 (46%) 101.8 +0.27 1997 1579 109.4 — — — — +17 -21 +72 33.3% -1.26 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.4 +0.32
27 2002 1641 120.5 — — — — -19 -46 -67 44.1% -0.36 8–7 (53%) 4–7 (36%) 100.1 +1.02 1998 1525 102.8 — — — — +21 — — 34.8% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — +0.31
28 2003 1534 112.1 +0.28 +0.94 1.123 52.5% -41 +90 +57 40.7% -0.78 6–9 (40%) 1–3 (25%) 97.2 +1.70 1999 1570 122.3 — — — — -17 +45 — 44.4% -0.08 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.02
29 2004 1536 104.3 -0.87 -1.71 0.916 47.8% -71 +57 +70 44.6% -0.70 5–9 (36%) 6–3 (67%) 100.9 +1.29 2000 1565 124.4 — — — — +8 +10 -5 44.9% -0.06 1–6 (14%) 2–4 (33%) 93.3 -0.24
30 2005 1518 99.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.22 2001 1523 118.1 — — — — +25 +26 — 33.3% -0.72 0–2 0–2 — -0.05
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1606 123.2 — — — — +7 -75 -6 42.6% -0.40 7–2 (78%) 2–3 (40%) 105.1 -0.33
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1637 127.2 -0.92 -1.45 0.759 44.5% +8 -178 +36 41.1% -0.48 5–4 (56%) 4–3 (57%) 102.9 -1.93
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1539 102.6 -1.13 -2.60 0.779 44.6% +15 -107 +61 33.3% -1.44 2–6 (25%) 3–1 (75%) 97.1 -0.15
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1522 96.0 -1.14 -3.36 0.793 46.2% +16 — — 25.0% -1.88 — 1–1 — +0.11
Career — 1755 128.5 -0.35 -0.51 1.007 50.0% +13 -66 -49 45.2% -0.40 63–69 (48%) 38–41 (48%) 101.0 +1.12 — 1716 123.9 -1.05 -2.22 0.772 44.7% -2 -39 +39 41.1% -0.57 30–36 (45%) 22–25 (47%) 98.5 -0.12

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.