H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Rita Grande vs Gala Leon Garcia H2H: 1-3
Gala Leon Garcia holds a 3–1 lead over Rita Grande in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Gala Leon Garcia leads 2–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Rita Grande won the 2001 Australian Open first round 6-2 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 51
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 52
Left-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2001* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Rita Grande | 6-2 7-6(2) | Gala Leon Garcia | Match data |
| Jul 21, 2000* | Sopot | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Gala Leon Garcia | 6-7(6) 6-2 6-3 | Rita Grande | Match data |
| May 26, 2000* | Madrid | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Gala Leon Garcia | 6-4 6-4 | Rita Grande | Match data |
| Aug 14, 1996* | Manhattan Beach | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Gala Leon Garcia | 7-6 2-6 6-4 | Rita Grande | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rita Grande | #1,172 | #24 | 1,020 | 1,755 | 172 | 218 | 44.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Gala Leon Garcia | #361 | #27 | 978 | 1,837 | 117 | 141 | 45.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rita Grande | Gala Leon Garcia | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #370 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #146 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1995 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #72 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1996 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #71 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #135 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #44 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #89 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #59 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #56 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #53 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #53 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #24 | 1,742 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #31 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2002 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #46 | 1,641 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #41 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2003 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #70 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 10–23 | 30.3% | #130 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2004 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #96 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1088 | 1,518 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #221 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 |