H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Rita Grande vs Henrieta Nagyova H2H: 1-3
Henrieta Nagyova holds a 3–1 lead over Rita Grande in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Henrieta Nagyova leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rita Grande won the 2004 Roland Garros first round 7-6(7) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 51
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 47
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2004* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Rita Grande | 7-6(7) 6-1 | Henrieta Nagyova | Match data |
| Jul 13, 2000* | Palermo | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Henrieta Nagyova | 6-2 6-4 | Rita Grande | Match data |
| Apr 1, 1999* | Hilton Head | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Henrieta Nagyova | 6-1 6-2 | Rita Grande | Match data |
| Jan 15, 1998* | Hobart | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Henrieta Nagyova | 6-3 3-6 6-0 | Rita Grande | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rita Grande | #1,172 | #24 | 1,020 | 1,755 | 172 | 218 | 44.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Henrieta Nagyova | #723 | #21 | 1,277 | 1,942 | 200 | 171 | 53.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rita Grande | Henrieta Nagyova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #370 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #37 | 1,703 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #35 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1994 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #146 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #28 | 1,833 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1995 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #72 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #32 | 1,694 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 1996 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #71 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #40 | 1,796 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 1997 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #44 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #25 | 1,749 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1998 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #59 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #59 | 1,637 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1999 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #91 | 1,626 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 2000 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #153 | 1,567 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 2001 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #24 | 1,742 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #145 | 1,568 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 2002 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #46 | 1,641 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #252 | 1,530 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2003 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #70 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2004 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1088 | 1,518 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |