H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Rita Grande vs Janet Lee H2H: 1-0

Rita Grande holds a 1–0 lead over Janet Lee in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rita Grande leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Rita Grande won the 1998 Roland Garros round of 128 7-6(7) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rita Grande
ITA Age 51 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Janet Lee
TPE Age 49 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Rita Grande #42 7-6(7) 6-3 Janet Lee #92 Match data May 27, 1998* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rita Grande #1,172 #24 1,020 1,755 173 220 44.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Janet Lee #863 #79 390 1,570 31 67 31.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rita Grande Janet Lee
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1991 0–2 0.0% #370 1,471 0 0 1993 0–1 0.0% #547 1,491 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1994 1–2 33.3% #270 1,508 0 0
18 1993 0–1 0.0% #186 1,456 0 0 1995 4–7 36.4% #169 1,519 0 0
19 1994 7–12 36.8% #146 1,491 0 0 1996 0–2 0.0% #175 1,513 0 0
20 1995 10–11 47.6% #72 1,591 0 0 1997 3–4 42.9% #114 1,525 0 0
21 1996 10–16 38.5% #71 1,617 0 0 1998 4–14 22.2% #86 1,498 0 0
22 1997 15–18 45.5% #44 1,667 0 0 1999 5–10 33.3% #95 1,487 0 0
23 1998 12–23 34.3% #59 1,581 0 0 2000 5–8 38.5% #117 1,514 0 0
24 1999 21–18 53.8% #54 1,677 0 0 2001 7–9 43.8% #111 1,555 0 0
25 2000 16–22 42.1% #77 1,608 0 0 2002 1–6 14.3% #217 1,524 0 0
26 2001 35–26 57.4% #24 1,742 0 2 2003 1–3 25.0% #162 1,511 0 0
27 2002 21–27 43.8% #46 1,640 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 2003 14–25 35.9% #70 1,534 0 3 2005 0–1 0.0% #694 1,495 0 0
29 2004 12–18 40.0% #104 1,536 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 2005 0–1 0.0% #1088 1,518 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rita Grande Janet Lee
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1991 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1993 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1995 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 1994 7 9 16 43.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1996 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1995 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1996 8 9 17 47.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 3 10 13 23.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1997 12 11 23 52.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1999 4 5 9 44.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
23 1998 4 10 14 28.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2000 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1999 15 9 24 62.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2001 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 2000 6 10 16 37.5% 6 9 15 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 2002 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2001 28 16 44 63.6% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
27 2002 12 15 27 44.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2003 3 13 16 18.8% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2004 5 10 15 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 110 122 232 47.4% 37 56 93 39.8% 15 24 39 38.5% 11 18 29 37.9% — 26 46 72 36.1% 1 11 12 8.3% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rita Grande Janet Lee
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1991 1471 91.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.25 1993 1492 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.01
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1508 115.6 — — — — +41 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–0 — — -0.45
18 1993 1456 94.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.13 1995 1519 101.0 — — — — +57 +14 — 28.6% -2.14 1–0 3–0 (100%) — -0.04
19 1994 1492 108.7 — — — — +66 — — 40.0% -0.67 3–4 (43%) 0–4 (0%) 95.5 +0.41 1996 1514 120.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — -0.48
20 1995 1591 131.2 — — — — +49 — — 47.1% +0.26 5–4 (56%) 1–4 (20%) 100.8 +0.32 1997 1526 105.6 — — — — +53 — — 37.5% -1.13 2–0 0–1 — +0.41
21 1996 1618 126.5 — — — — +22 -164 -67 42.4% -0.41 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) 94.9 +0.05 1998 1499 121.5 — — — — +38 — — 30.0% -1.10 0–6 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 92.7 -0.18
22 1997 1668 136.7 — — — — +21 -161 — 48.7% -0.33 4–10 (29%) 4–1 (80%) 97.9 +0.01 1999 1488 111.5 — — — — +57 -62 — 38.2% -0.50 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.61
23 1998 1581 124.9 — — — — +29 -89 -16 37.0% -1.12 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 103.0 -0.29 2000 1515 113.7 — — — — +33 — — 43.3% -0.40 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.34
24 1999 1678 125.6 — — — — +23 -179 -105 50.0% -0.45 10–2 (83%) 5–2 (71%) 110.9 -0.74 2001 1556 116.3 — — — — +6 — — 47.2% +0.08 3–3 (50%) 0–2 — +0.01
25 2000 1608 123.5 — — — — +28 -76 -44 43.9% -0.27 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 101.6 -0.24 2002 1525 103.5 — — — — +30 — — 13.3% -2.93 1–0 1–1 — -0.90
26 2001 1742 138.0 — — — — +31 -163 -198 54.7% +0.35 11–8 (58%) 6–7 (46%) 101.8 +0.27 2003 1512 102.1 -0.98 -0.78 0.826 45.5% — — +13 33.3% -0.45 0–1 0–1 — +0.01
27 2002 1641 120.5 — — — — -19 -46 -67 44.1% -0.36 8–7 (53%) 4–7 (36%) 100.1 +1.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2003 1534 112.1 +0.28 +0.94 1.123 52.5% -41 +90 +57 40.7% -0.78 6–9 (40%) 1–3 (25%) 97.2 +1.70 2005 1496 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.09
29 2004 1536 104.3 -0.87 -1.71 0.916 47.8% -71 +57 +70 44.6% -0.70 5–9 (36%) 6–3 (67%) 100.9 +1.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2005 1518 99.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1755 128.5 -0.35 -0.51 1.007 50.0% +13 -66 -49 45.2% -0.40 63–69 (48%) 38–41 (48%) 101.0 +1.12 — 1571 119.1 -0.98 -0.78 0.826 45.5% +36 -24 +13 34.3% -1.01 10–16 (38%) 7–12 (37%) 93.8 -0.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.