H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Rita Grande vs Janette Husarova H2H: 2-1
Rita Grande holds a 2–1 lead over Janette Husarova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Rita Grande leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Janette Husarova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Rita Grande won the 2003 Los Angeles second round 6-3 5-7 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 51
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 52
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2003* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Rita Grande | 6-3 5-7 6-4 | Janette Husarova | Match data |
| Apr 10, 2002* | Amelia Island | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Janette Husarova | 6-1 6-1 | Rita Grande | Match data |
| Nov 17, 1995* | Pattaya | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Rita Grande | 6-2 6-2 | Janette Husarova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rita Grande | #1,172 | #24 | 1,020 | 1,755 | 172 | 218 | 44.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Janette Husarova | #1,055 | #31 | 1,006 | 1,737 | 79 | 109 | 42.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rita Grande | Janette Husarova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #370 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #146 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #82 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1995 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #72 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #145 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #71 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #102 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #44 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #76 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #59 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #375 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #127 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2000 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #216 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2001 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #24 | 1,742 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #149 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2002 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #46 | 1,641 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #72 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2003 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #70 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #33 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2004 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #126 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1088 | 1,518 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #205 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #366 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |