H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Rita Grande vs Larisa Savchenko H2H: 0-1
Larisa Savchenko holds a 1–0 lead over Rita Grande in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Larisa Savchenko leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Larisa Savchenko won the 1997 Birmingham second round 5-7 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 51
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
URS
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 1997* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Larisa Savchenko | 5-7 6-1 6-2 | Rita Grande | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rita Grande | #1,172 | #24 | 1,020 | 1,755 | 172 | 218 | 44.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Larisa Savchenko | #305 | #13 | 454 | 1,926 | 238 | 239 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Rita Grande | Larisa Savchenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #370 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #146 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #55 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #72 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #36 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #71 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #44 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #16 | 1,861 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #59 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,887 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #91 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #48 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 2001 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #24 | 1,742 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 2002 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #46 | 1,641 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #33 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 |
| 2003 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #70 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #41 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 |
| 2004 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #99 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1088 | 1,518 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #61 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #87 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #73 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #210 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 |