H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Rita Grande vs Maja Matevzic H2H: 0-2
Maja Matevzic holds a 2–0 lead over Rita Grande in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Maja Matevzic leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maja Matevzic won the 2002 Bratislava semifinal 0-6 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 51
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
SLO
Age 46
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2002* | Bratislava | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Maja Matevzic | 0-6 6-2 6-0 | Rita Grande | Match data |
| Oct 3, 2002* | Moscow | WTA 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Maja Matevzic | 6-4 7-5 | Rita Grande | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rita Grande | #1,172 | #24 | 1,020 | 1,755 | 172 | 218 | 44.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Maja Matevzic | #1,250 | #38 | 840 | 1,711 | 45 | 50 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rita Grande | Maja Matevzic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #370 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #146 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1995 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #72 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1996 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #71 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #75 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1997 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #44 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #51 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1998 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #59 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1999 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2000 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #649 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2001 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #24 | 1,742 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2002 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #46 | 1,641 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2003 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #70 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2004 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1088 | 1,518 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |