H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Rita Grande vs Marianne Werdel Witmeyer H2H: 1-1
Rita Grande and Marianne Werdel Witmeyer are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Marianne Werdel Witmeyer won the 1997 Hobart fourth round 4-6 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 51
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 1997* | Hobart | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 4-6 7-5 7-5 | Rita Grande | Match data |
| Apr 14, 1995* | Tokyo | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Rita Grande | 6-2 6-4 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rita Grande | #1,172 | #24 | 1,020 | 1,755 | 172 | 218 | 44.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,849 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Rita Grande | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #370 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #146 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #72 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #71 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #44 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #59 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 2000 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 1 |
| 2001 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #24 | 1,742 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 2002 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #46 | 1,641 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 2003 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #70 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| 2004 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1088 | 1,518 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |