H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Rita Grande vs Nancy Feber H2H: 1-1 (incl. walkovers)

Rita Grande vs Nancy Feber: 0–1 excluding walkovers; 1–1 including 1 walkover. Across 2 main-draw results including walkovers, Nancy Feber leads 1–0 on grass, while Rita Grande leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rita Grande won the 1997 Jakarta quarterfinal W/O.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rita Grande

ITA Age 51 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H including walkovers

1 – 1

2 main-draw results

Nancy Feber

BEL Age 50 Left-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

Player	Score	Player	Match Data	Date	Round	Tournament	Category	Surface
Rita Grande #79	(w/o)	Nancy Feber #138	Match data	Apr 27, 1997*	QF	Jakarta	Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250	Hard
Nancy Feber #109	1-6 7-6 7-5	Rita Grande #123	Match data	Jun 14, 1995*	R64	Birmingham	Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250	Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000 including documented historical predecessor categories	Finals	500 including documented historical predecessor categories	250 including documented historical predecessor categories	Titles
Rita Grande	#1,172	#24	1,020	1,755	173	220	44.0%	0	0	0	0	3	3
Nancy Feber	#589	#79	219	1,566	25	47	34.7%	0	0	0	0	0	0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Rita Grande							Nancy Feber
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
16	1991	0–2	0.0%	#370	1,471	0	0	1992	1–1	50.0%	#165	1,502	0	0
17	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1993	3–9	25.0%	#152	1,486	0	0
18	1993	0–1	0.0%	#186	1,456	0	0	1994	4–9	30.8%	#124	1,482	0	0
19	1994	7–12	36.8%	#146	1,491	0	0	1995	9–12	42.9%	#101	1,549	0	0
20	1995	10–11	47.6%	#72	1,591	0	0	1996	6–12	33.3%	#109	1,513	0	0
21	1996	10–16	38.5%	#71	1,617	0	0	1997	2–4	33.3%	#177	1,516	0	0
22	1997	15–18	45.5%	#44	1,667	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
23	1998	12–23	34.3%	#59	1,581	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
24	1999	21–18	53.8%	#54	1,677	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
25	2000	16–22	42.1%	#77	1,608	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
26	2001	35–26	57.4%	#24	1,742	0	2	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	2002	21–27	43.8%	#46	1,640	0	2	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	2003	14–25	35.9%	#70	1,534	0	3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	2004	12–18	40.0%	#104	1,536	0	3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	2005	0–1	0.0%	#1088	1,518	0	3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age	Rita Grande																	Nancy Feber
	Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet				Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet
	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %
16	1991	—	—	—	—	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1992	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
17	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1993	2	3	5	40.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	1	3	4	25.0%
18	1993	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1994	1	5	6	16.7%	1	1	2	50.0%	2	2	4	50.0%	0	1	1	0.0%
19	1994	7	9	16	43.8%	0	2	2	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	1995	3	7	10	30.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	4	3	7	57.1%	1	1	2	50.0%
20	1995	10	9	19	52.6%	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	1996	2	7	9	22.2%	1	1	2	50.0%	3	3	6	50.0%	0	1	1	0.0%
21	1996	8	9	17	47.1%	1	4	5	20.0%	1	2	3	33.3%	0	1	1	0.0%	1997	2	2	4	50.0%	—	—	—	—	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—
22	1997	12	11	23	52.2%	3	3	6	50.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
23	1998	4	10	14	28.6%	3	6	9	33.3%	2	3	5	40.0%	3	4	7	42.9%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
24	1999	15	9	24	62.5%	2	5	7	28.6%	3	3	6	50.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
25	2000	6	10	16	37.5%	6	9	15	40.0%	1	2	3	33.3%	3	1	4	75.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
26	2001	28	16	44	63.6%	6	7	13	46.2%	1	3	4	25.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	2002	12	15	27	44.4%	4	6	10	40.0%	3	3	6	50.0%	2	3	5	40.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	2003	3	13	16	18.8%	8	6	14	57.1%	1	2	3	33.3%	2	4	6	33.3%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	2004	5	10	15	33.3%	4	5	9	44.4%	3	2	5	60.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	2005	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	110	122	232	47.4%	37	56	93	39.8%	15	24	39	38.5%	11	18	29	37.9%	—	10	24	34	29.4%	4	6	10	40.0%	9	11	20	45.0%	2	6	8	25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age	Rita Grande																Nancy Feber
Age	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule
16	1991	1471	91.5	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-4.00	—	—	—	+0.25	1992	1502	100.0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	50.0%	-0.25	—	—	—	+0.25
17	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1993	1487	111.8	—	—	—	—	+51	—	—	26.9%	-1.54	1–1	—	—	-0.06
18	1993	1456	94.1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-4.50	—	—	—	+0.13	1994	1483	105.3	—	—	—	—	-15	—	+102	36.7%	-0.73	1–3 (25%)	0–1	—	+0.24
19	1994	1492	108.7	—	—	—	—	+66	—	—	40.0%	-0.67	3–4 (43%)	0–4 (0%)	95.5	+0.41	1995	1550	117.2	—	—	—	—	-78	—	+71	45.8%	-0.15	2–4 (33%)	1–1	—	+0.43
20	1995	1591	131.2	—	—	—	—	+49	—	—	47.1%	+0.26	5–4 (56%)	1–4 (20%)	100.8	+0.32	1996	1513	113.7	—	—	—	—	-89	—	+173	45.5%	-0.27	0–8 (0%)	4–0 (100%)	95.3	+1.75
21	1996	1618	126.5	—	—	—	—	+22	-164	-67	42.4%	-0.41	2–5 (29%)	2–4 (33%)	94.9	+0.05	1997	1516	106.1	—	—	—	—	-48	—	—	40.0%	-0.70	—	2–2 (50%)	—	+0.12
22	1997	1668	136.7	—	—	—	—	+21	-161	—	48.7%	-0.33	4–10 (29%)	4–1 (80%)	97.9	+0.01	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
23	1998	1581	124.9	—	—	—	—	+29	-89	-16	37.0%	-1.12	5–6 (45%)	4–2 (67%)	103.0	-0.29	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
24	1999	1678	125.6	—	—	—	—	+23	-179	-105	50.0%	-0.45	10–2 (83%)	5–2 (71%)	110.9	-0.74	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
25	2000	1608	123.5	—	—	—	—	+28	-76	-44	43.9%	-0.27	4–4 (50%)	5–3 (63%)	101.6	-0.24	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
26	2001	1742	138.0	—	—	—	—	+31	-163	-198	54.7%	+0.35	11–8 (58%)	6–7 (46%)	101.8	+0.27	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	2002	1641	120.5	—	—	—	—	-19	-46	-67	44.1%	-0.36	8–7 (53%)	4–7 (36%)	100.1	+1.02	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	2003	1534	112.1	+0.28	+0.94	1.123	52.5%	-41	+90	+57	40.7%	-0.78	6–9 (40%)	1–3 (25%)	97.2	+1.70	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	2004	1536	104.3	-0.87	-1.71	0.916	47.8%	-71	+57	+70	44.6%	-0.70	5–9 (36%)	6–3 (67%)	100.9	+1.29	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	2005	1518	99.1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	33.3%	-0.33	0–1	0–1	—	+0.22	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	1755	128.5	-0.35	-0.51	1.007	50.0%	+13	-66	-49	45.2%	-0.40	63–69 (48%)	38–41 (48%)	101.0	+1.12	—	1567	115.2	—	—	—	—	-40	—	+114	40.7%	-0.55	4–16 (20%)	7–4 (64%)	94.3	+3.85

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.

Rita Grande's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Iva Majoli	3	3	6	Mar 25, 2004	H2H
Tamarine Tanasugarn	3	3	6	Aug 27, 2003	H2H
Jelena Dokic	1	5	6	Jun 13, 2003	H2H
Cara Black	0	5	5	Jun 9, 2004	H2H
Anna Smashnova	2	3	5	Mar 26, 2004	H2H

Nancy Feber's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Els Callens	0	3	3	Oct 24, 1996	H2H
Meredith Mcgrath	0	3	3	Jun 30, 1996	H2H
Rita Grande	1	1	2	Apr 27, 1997	H2H
Anne Miller	1	1	2	Jun 28, 1996	H2H
Yayuk Basuki	0	2	2	Jun 21, 1996	H2H