H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Rita Grande vs Natasha Zvereva H2H: 0-2

Natasha Zvereva holds a 2–0 lead over Rita Grande in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Natasha Zvereva leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Natasha Zvereva won the 1999 Birmingham round of 16 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rita Grande
ITA Age 51 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Natasha Zvereva
BLR Age 55 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Natasha Zvereva #17 6-4 6-2 Rita Grande #56 Match data Jun 11, 1999* R16 Birmingham Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Natasha Zvereva #23 6-4 6-4 Rita Grande #46 Match data Jan 23, 1998* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rita Grande #1,172 #24 1,020 1,755 173 220 44.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Natasha Zvereva #201 #5 1,820 2,074 394 236 62.5% 0 0 0 2 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rita Grande Natasha Zvereva
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1986 4–2 66.7% #94 1,575 0 0
16 1991 0–2 0.0% #370 1,471 0 0 1987 21–11 65.6% #19 1,835 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1988 40–18 69.0% #7 1,997 0 0
18 1993 0–1 0.0% #186 1,456 0 0 1989 23–17 57.5% #27 1,804 0 0
19 1994 7–12 36.8% #146 1,491 0 0 1990 38–15 71.7% #12 1,953 0 2
20 1995 10–11 47.6% #72 1,591 0 0 1991 29–18 61.7% #21 1,912 0 2
21 1996 10–16 38.5% #71 1,617 0 0 1992 34–20 63.0% #23 1,981 0 2
22 1997 15–18 45.5% #44 1,667 0 0 1993 37–19 66.1% #19 1,973 0 2
23 1998 12–23 34.3% #59 1,581 0 0 1994 29–12 70.7% #10 1,979 0 3
24 1999 21–18 53.8% #54 1,677 0 0 1995 31–17 64.6% #14 1,970 0 3
25 2000 16–22 42.1% #77 1,608 0 0 1996 13–13 50.0% #57 1,897 0 3
26 2001 35–26 57.4% #24 1,742 0 2 1997 25–20 55.6% #25 1,907 0 3
27 2002 21–27 43.8% #46 1,640 0 2 1998 35–21 62.5% #16 1,934 0 4
28 2003 14–25 35.9% #70 1,534 0 3 1999 24–19 55.8% #27 1,824 0 5
29 2004 12–18 40.0% #104 1,536 0 3 2000 11–13 45.8% #78 1,733 0 5
30 2005 0–1 0.0% #1088 1,518 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% — 1,708 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rita Grande Natasha Zvereva
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 4 1 5 80.0%
16 1991 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1987 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 16 10 26 61.5% 9 2 11 81.8% 8 2 10 80.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
18 1993 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1989 12 6 18 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
19 1994 7 9 16 43.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1990 15 3 18 83.3% 12 5 17 70.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 4 5 9 44.4%
20 1995 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 13 8 21 61.9% 8 4 12 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 4 7 42.9%
21 1996 8 9 17 47.1% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 7 7 14 50.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 5 11 54.5%
22 1997 12 11 23 52.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1993 15 6 21 71.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 9 6 15 60.0%
23 1998 4 10 14 28.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1994 7 4 11 63.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 3 15 80.0%
24 1999 15 9 24 62.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1995 17 8 25 68.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 4 7 42.9%
25 2000 6 10 16 37.5% 6 9 15 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 1996 6 6 12 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 2001 28 16 44 63.6% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1997 15 10 25 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0%
27 2002 12 15 27 44.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1998 15 10 25 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 5 10 50.0%
28 2003 3 13 16 18.8% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1999 8 9 17 47.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
29 2004 5 10 15 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 3 5 8 37.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 110 122 232 47.4% 37 56 93 39.8% 15 24 39 38.5% 11 18 29 37.9% — 157 98 255 61.6% 98 56 154 63.6% 71 31 102 69.6% 68 51 119 57.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rita Grande Natasha Zvereva
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1575 112.4 — — — — +63 — — 56.3% -0.12 3–1 (75%) 2–0 — +0.85
16 1991 1471 91.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.25 1987 1836 140.5 — — — — -21 -249 -181 63.8% +0.70 5–4 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 104.1 +0.51
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1997 161.2 — — — — -75 -213 -183 66.7% +1.05 7–6 (54%) 8–4 (67%) 106.4 -3.11
18 1993 1456 94.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.13 1989 1805 144.1 — — — — +20 -25 -21 57.3% +0.91 4–5 (44%) 2–7 (22%) 91.9 -0.26
19 1994 1492 108.7 — — — — +66 — — 40.0% -0.67 3–4 (43%) 0–4 (0%) 95.5 +0.41 1990 1953 156.8 — — — — -78 -41 -36 65.8% +1.03 10–5 (67%) 6–4 (60%) 106.3 -0.92
20 1995 1591 131.2 — — — — +49 — — 47.1% +0.26 5–4 (56%) 1–4 (20%) 100.8 +0.32 1991 1912 148.8 — — — — -66 +41 +34 59.2% +0.55 6–3 (67%) 10–5 (67%) 106.2 -0.24
21 1996 1618 126.5 — — — — +22 -164 -67 42.4% -0.41 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) 94.9 +0.05 1992 1982 158.3 — — — — -114 +58 +53 61.3% +0.90 6–5 (55%) 8–6 (57%) 102.4 -2.82
22 1997 1668 136.7 — — — — +21 -161 — 48.7% -0.33 4–10 (29%) 4–1 (80%) 97.9 +0.01 1993 1974 157.3 — — — — -22 -9 +90 65.3% +0.98 7–3 (70%) 8–4 (67%) 104.2 +0.50
23 1998 1581 124.9 — — — — +29 -89 -16 37.0% -1.12 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 103.0 -0.29 1994 1979 161.7 — — — — +7 -6 +1 69.6% +1.40 6–6 (50%) 7–3 (70%) 101.8 -1.08
24 1999 1678 125.6 — — — — +23 -179 -105 50.0% -0.45 10–2 (83%) 5–2 (71%) 110.9 -0.74 1995 1971 161.0 — — — — +27 -3 +16 59.5% +0.80 13–7 (65%) 6–6 (50%) 100.5 -0.19
25 2000 1608 123.5 — — — — +28 -76 -44 43.9% -0.27 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 101.6 -0.24 1996 1897 147.8 — — — — +45 +39 +91 50.0% -0.02 2–4 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 94.9 -1.77
26 2001 1742 138.0 — — — — +31 -163 -198 54.7% +0.35 11–8 (58%) 6–7 (46%) 101.8 +0.27 1997 1907 154.8 — — — — +11 +5 +82 56.3% +0.19 8–4 (67%) 8–3 (73%) 107.1 -3.07
27 2002 1641 120.5 — — — — -19 -46 -67 44.1% -0.36 8–7 (53%) 4–7 (36%) 100.1 +1.02 1998 1934 156.7 — — — — -36 -9 +187 60.5% +0.47 7–5 (58%) 4–4 (50%) 99.6 -3.30
28 2003 1534 112.1 +0.28 +0.94 1.123 52.5% -41 +90 +57 40.7% -0.78 6–9 (40%) 1–3 (25%) 97.2 +1.70 1999 1825 141.3 — — — — +2 0 +268 54.8% +0.40 8–3 (73%) 3–7 (30%) 99.9 -0.76
29 2004 1536 104.3 -0.87 -1.71 0.916 47.8% -71 +57 +70 44.6% -0.70 5–9 (36%) 6–3 (67%) 100.9 +1.29 2000 1733 128.2 — — — — +39 +59 +392 42.0% -0.66 5–1 (83%) 0–2 — -0.52
30 2005 1518 99.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1708 97.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.15
Career — 1755 128.5 -0.35 -0.51 1.007 50.0% +13 -66 -49 45.2% -0.40 63–69 (48%) 38–41 (48%) 101.0 +1.12 — 2074 160.7 — — — — -23 -15 +55 60.5% +0.69 97–63 (61%) 77–61 (56%) 107.9 -2.55

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.