H2H data updated: 2026-07-25 23:01 UTC
Rita Grande vs Patricia Hy Boulais H2H: 0-1
Patricia Hy Boulais holds a 1–0 lead over Rita Grande in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Patricia Hy Boulais leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Patricia Hy Boulais won the 1996 Atlanta Olympics second round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 51
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 60
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 1996* | Atlanta Olympics | Olympics | R64 | Hard | Patricia Hy Boulais | 6-4 6-4 | Rita Grande | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rita Grande | #1,172 | #24 | 1,020 | 1,755 | 173 | 220 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Patricia Hy Boulais | — | — | — | 1,906 | 142 | 165 | 46.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rita Grande | Patricia Hy Boulais | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #370 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1994 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #146 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1995 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #72 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 8–1 | 88.9% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1996 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #71 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1997 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #44 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,549 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1998 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #59 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1999 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2000 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #77 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 18–17 | 51.4% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2001 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #24 | 1,742 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 22–16 | 57.9% | — | 1,876 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2002 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #46 | 1,640 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 21–15 | 58.3% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2003 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #70 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 15–16 | 48.4% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2004 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,536 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,691 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1088 | 1,518 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 10–16 | 38.5% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 12–19 | 38.7% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,573 | 0 | 1 |