H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Rita Kuti-Kis vs Ann Grossman H2H: 1-0
Rita Kuti-Kis holds a 1–0 lead over Ann Grossman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rita Kuti-Kis leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Rita Kuti-Kis won the 1996 Budapest third round 6-2 4-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HUN
Age 48
Left-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 1996* | Budapest | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Rita Kuti-Kis | 6-2 4-6 6-1 | Ann Grossman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rita Kuti-Kis | #1,325 | #47 | 660 | 1,700 | 58 | 68 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ann Grossman | #343 | #29 | 384 | 1,888 | 187 | 185 | 50.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rita Kuti-Kis | Ann Grossman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #48 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1996 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #183 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #54 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #277 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #50 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1998 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #115 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #89 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #87 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #36 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #56 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #35 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #78 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #37 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #171 | 1,510 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #88 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #174 | 1,476 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #72 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #75 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #283 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |