H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Rita Kuti-Kis vs Lenka Nemeckova H2H: 1-1
Rita Kuti-Kis and Lenka Nemeckova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Lenka Nemeckova won the 2001 Roland Garros first round 3-6 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HUN
Age 48
Left-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 50
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2001* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Lenka Nemeckova | 3-6 6-2 6-2 | Rita Kuti-Kis | Match data |
| Apr 24, 1999* | Budapest | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Rita Kuti-Kis | 6-1 6-3 | Lenka Nemeckova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rita Kuti-Kis | #1,325 | #47 | 660 | 1,700 | 58 | 68 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Lenka Nemeckova | #787 | #72 | 337 | 1,570 | 27 | 46 | 37.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rita Kuti-Kis | Lenka Nemeckova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1996 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #183 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #277 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1998 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #115 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #150 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #87 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #83 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #56 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #142 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #78 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #108 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #171 | 1,510 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #155 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #174 | 1,476 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #136 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #190 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #146 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |