H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Romina Oprandi vs Catalina Castano H2H: 0-1
Catalina Castano holds a 1–0 lead over Romina Oprandi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Catalina Castano leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Catalina Castano won the 2005 Palermo third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 40
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
COL
Age 47
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2005* | Palermo | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Catalina Castano | 6-4 6-4 | Romina Oprandi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Romina Oprandi | #895 | #32 | 1,490 | 1,694 | 54 | 88 | 38.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Catalina Castano | #1,073 | #35 | 623 | 1,703 | 83 | 109 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Romina Oprandi | Catalina Castano | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2006 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #256 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #144 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #194 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #215 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #135 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #66 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #113 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #82 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #57 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2012 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #61 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #54 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2013 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #78 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2014 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #114 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #397 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #189 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #254 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #232 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |